<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Most Expensive Budget in MOVIE HISTORY]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mdidesidero</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 20, 2015 11:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And it's really not even close.  Budget pushed 400M.  Dissapointing for the $ spent, I must say.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248624/most-expensive-budget-in-movie-history</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 03:25:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248624.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:50:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Most Expensive Budget in MOVIE HISTORY on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:50:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mrexcitement-16054</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 30, 2016 06:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">At World's End is #2</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092410</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092410</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:50:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>