<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[..Nate, why didn&#x27;t Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Southland</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Erendinger</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 08, 2015 10:51 AM)</em></p>
<h2>..Nate, why didn't Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn't help much. I'm sure they would have backed off, at least for a while. Long enough for the reinforcements to arrive</h2>
<p dir="auto">there's plenty of kooks out there. data travelers, electro wizards, techno anarchists!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248716/nate-why-didn-t-sammy-start-shooting-at-those-guys-instead-of-firing-warning-shots-into-the-air-which-obviously-didn</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:11:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248716.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..Nate, why didn&#x27;t Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Leopheard</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 22, 2016 10:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Of course he can start shooting. You are allowed to protect yourself and others with lethal force when your friends has just been possibly killed right next to you.<br />
Is it reasonable for Nate to assume he was next? Yes. He was outnumbered, surroundedby dangerous thugs with weapons and he was on the floor. He should have wastedas many as possible, such a poorly written scene. Firing warning shots in the air? Only on a tv show. Those shots would come down a few minutes later and may kill someone unrelated and he'd be done for manslaughter. The academy would never in a million years tell anyone to do that and it seems the writers were pandering to the misguided public opinion.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092866</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092866</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..Nate, why didn&#x27;t Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jerique</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 28, 2016 07:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">(1) A cop doesn't shoot to wound. Cops are trained to shoot center mass and be lethal.<br />
(2) Sammy was outnumbered. If he starts wildly shooting, he will get killed too.<br />
(3) Yes, Nate was attacked but Sammy can't just start shooting people because of that. If he did, and he survived, he'd be charged because the gang members at that point were not being a threat to his life.<br />
(4) He doesn't have enough bullets for all of them.<br />
__<br />
Welcome to the O.C., bitch. -<br />
Luke Ward<br />
,<br />
The O.C.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092865</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092865</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..Nate, why didn&#x27;t Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BrunoAntony</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 16, 2016 04:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Because there were more people than bullets in his clip?<br />
What an odd question.<br />
Due to the lack of moderators, trolls can ruin the IMDB message boards. Don't feed them.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092864</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092864</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..Nate, why didn&#x27;t Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bubblenator</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 16, 2015 02:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ummmm if you watch the episode again he does actually shoot a gangbanger getting too close to Nate's body.<br />
If you are not willing to give up everything, you have already lost</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092863</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092863</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..Nate, why didn&#x27;t Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>christiannyblom</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 23, 2015 08:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, but they were only a few feet from him. He can only shoot so many before the rest overpower him. Bare hands can be just as lethal as guns. Especially when there's around a dosen pairs of hands.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092862</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092862</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..Nate, why didn&#x27;t Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Erendinger</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 23, 2015 08:27 AM)</em></p>
<h2>They didn't seem to have been armed (which maybe isn't very plausible), otherwise they surely had drawn their guns, instead of trying to just grab Sammy. So if you shoot one or two (preferably the ones with baseball bats or rods) you'd already be a bit "safer", no?</h2>
<p dir="auto">there's plenty of kooks out there. data travelers, electro wizards, techno anarchists!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092861</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092861</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ..Nate, why didn&#x27;t Sammy start shooting at those guys instead of firing warning shots into the air, which obviously didn on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>christiannyblom</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 22, 2015 02:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Because before the dead gang member had hit the ground, every single one of the orhers would have been on them and they'd both be killed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092860</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2092860</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:00:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>