<![CDATA[Better than die hard 5]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bullet to the Head

filmtenk — 12 years ago(August 19, 2013 10:36 PM)

Both are available on red box. Watched them both one after the other. Bullet was better

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248860/better-than-die-hard-5RSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 23:34:16 GMTTue, 05 May 2026 18:23:54 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Better than die hard 5 on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:24:05 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093952https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093952Tue, 05 May 2026 18:24:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Better than die hard 5 on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:24:04 GMT]]>clickbait — 10 years ago(February 05, 2016 03:27 PM)

yes it isbut everything is better than die hard 5not hard to top that
~If the realistic details fails, the movie fails~

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093951https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093951Tue, 05 May 2026 18:24:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Better than die hard 5 on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:24:02 GMT]]>bhobnine — 11 years ago(September 14, 2014 01:31 PM)

Totally agree.
As far as DIE HARD is concerned, I can stop after the first one.
Though I can watch that anytime,
I dont care if I see any of the sequels EVER AGAIN.
This wasnt bad, it hit the spot.
Pffft, my suspension of disbelief has higher standards than that.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093950https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093950Tue, 05 May 2026 18:24:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Better than die hard 5 on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:24:00 GMT]]>mrjonz72 — 11 years ago(August 23, 2014 06:46 PM)

Haha..I specifically came to this board to decide which one of these movies I'm going to watch tonite.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093949https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093949Tue, 05 May 2026 18:24:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Better than die hard 5 on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:23:59 GMT]]>tenantennae — 11 years ago(August 07, 2014 07:15 PM)

Oh, way better. Hey, it ain't Stallone's greatest, but it's entertaining, and it made me smile. It was on again the other day, and I watched most of it a 2nd time. It's a fun movie, and it wasn't trying to be anything more than that.
Die Hard 5 sucks the big one

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093948https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093948Tue, 05 May 2026 18:23:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Better than die hard 5 on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:23:58 GMT]]>kodak007 — 11 years ago(August 06, 2014 03:56 PM)

They both are pretty terrible But I have to agree with you that this is better than DH5, which has to be one of the best examples, of a franchise getting cancer and dying in front of our eyes.
I did not mind LFODH, but DH5 was bad enough that you are right, this terrible movie was better.

Kill Them, Kill Them All!
Flames or thoughts welcome.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093947https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093947Tue, 05 May 2026 18:23:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Better than die hard 5 on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:23:56 GMT]]>Prismark10 — 12 years ago(September 30, 2013 04:46 AM)

Both are not very good.
Its that man again!!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093946https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093946Tue, 05 May 2026 18:23:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Better than die hard 5 on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:23:55 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093945https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2093945Tue, 05 May 2026 18:23:55 GMT