<![CDATA[Thomas Jane was supposed to play Sung Kang's part]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bullet to the Head

Reese123 — 12 years ago(January 31, 2014 11:43 AM)

Would have been way better seeing Sly and Jane together

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248870/thomas-jane-was-supposed-to-play-sung-kang-s-partRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 20:53:50 GMTTue, 05 May 2026 18:27:21 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Thomas Jane was supposed to play Sung Kang's part on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:27:25 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2094101https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2094101Tue, 05 May 2026 18:27:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Thomas Jane was supposed to play Sung Kang's part on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:27:23 GMT]]>Prismark10 — 10 years ago(November 08, 2015 09:10 AM)

Sung would still have been better.
It's that man again!!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2094100https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2094100Tue, 05 May 2026 18:27:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Thomas Jane was supposed to play Sung Kang's part on Tue, 05 May 2026 18:27:22 GMT]]>glenfordguy — 12 years ago(February 01, 2014 01:51 AM)

For sure. Thomas Jane comes off a bit grittier and more realistic than stallone though. It may actually make stallone come off more cartoonish.
Maybe just get rid of stallone all together and go with Jane.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2094099https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2094099Tue, 05 May 2026 18:27:22 GMT