I am not posting that ****ty what if God was one of us song right now

This message has been deleted.

I understand the deeper meaning, you pedantic putz. Divinity speaks through me. I am the manifestation of the LORD on filmboards, a message board Jesus and whatever I dictate the deeper meaning to be, that is the way. You will accept this or face the wrath of my faithful. Their zeal is unmatched, as Is their propensity for violence.
Go. Sit there, with the rest of the heathers. This is my thread now.
Stop.

I believe you!

You know what? I simply cannot do this any longer. I just cannot. You dont believe like I do so you wouldnt understand the deeper meaning of why we are all here on filmboards together. Theres a purpose and a reason for this. Maybe it was accidental at first but now..theres a purpose and a meaning for our intereactions.

What does it mean to be alive? Per the definition of the word, merely being in “existence” constitutes being “alive,” so you’re wrong by definition.
Are we talking about the biological definition of living? Science is our best guess at acquiring an understanding of how things work. Our understanding of science continues to be revised to this day. What’s to say our understanding of what it means to be “alive” isn’t going to change radically as we explore the universe more? And even under the current definition of “Alive” in a biological context, god would not be considered alive so your point is moot and dead.
Stop.

The sun isnt alive.

Is the sun male or female? The earth? What about the universe?
Stop.

It is true that the primary depiction of Jesus Christ is of a white male when he was probably darker skinned. This was done because white males are more relatable to most of the target demographics for early Christianity. It is true that god is often depicted as a white male for the same reasons. You will accept this truth or be destroyed.
There is not more than one supreme being. For this to be the case neither being is “supreme.” That’s self evident given the word “supreme” and also given the text of the Bible, which I’ve studied very closely for a period of time. Read the Bible before you respond to me again.
Stop.

It’s a sexist interpretation of humanity’s sexist interpretation of god as a male. It’s blatantly sexist and that’s okay because it’s very true.
Its not true. I dont feel like searching for bible scriptures right now but refer to The Book of Genesis about the creation of humanity.
My interpretation of god is very much not sexist, however. I don’t think a god would have a gender. No need for sex organs if you don’t reproduce, although that logic is admittedly flawed when you consider the existence of PE and itty, both of whom has penises but don’t use them.
Ive read a few different versions of the holy bible written in english and in every one of them the scripture matches. There is more than one Supreme Being and when i interpret the scripture, it looks as though, both beings made humanity in their image.

It’s a sexist interpretation of humanity’s sexist interpretation of god as a male. It’s blatantly sexist and that’s okay because it’s very true.
My interpretation of god is very much not sexist, however. I don’t think a god would have a gender. No need for sex organs if you don’t reproduce, although that logic is admittedly flawed when you consider the existence of PE and itty, both of whom has penises but don’t use them.
Stop.

Dont you think thats a sexist interpretation of God the supreme being?

No..God definitely has a sexuality and a gender. And I think there were at least supreme beings that created the universe we inhabit.
Theres a biblical scripture that implies there being more than one Supreme Being.

The LORD likes to partake, if you know what I mean. Heh heh creepy shredder laugh

Why would god have a sex? What the **** is he doing with genitals!? Or, rather, who is he doing? Is he ****ing human women? Human men!!? Angels?!
I don’t think god is of the human form. He can apparently assume the human form but that doesn’t mean it’s his default state. Although the Bible does claim god is a “he” and he created man in “his image.” Maybe we need to ask Miley, she’s an expert.
Stop.

True. It's less "God is both" and more "both came from God and were made in his image." Then again, only Adam was made in God's image. Eve was just some skank he pulled out of Adam's ass.
But in truth there's no reason for God to have a sex. And let's not kid ourselves: the God of Abraham is
clearly
a man. That guy doesn't **** around.

I don’t think a god would be male or female. A god might take on a human form so humans would better relate to it. In the past, decision makers were almost always male hence the God of the abrahamic religions is depicted as a male human. But there’s no reason to think a god would have a sex.
Stop.

Theres not 107 genders. Thats not even possible unless youre trying to qualify extra-terrestrials as a species in the universe. I dont really believe in extra-terrestrials anyway.

There are 107 genders, Donna. God is at least 50 of them, for he is God.

Theres 2. I cannot be sure if they are related or not.

Presumably "he" would have traits of both.

My post doubled on its on. A glitch or something. Which post should I delete?

Yeah thats what the messengers of God wrote in the bible but sometimes, if i believe them, i wanna disagree. Sometimes God seems like a female. That reacts like a female does.

This message has been deleted.