<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Read the second draft by Cary and it&#x27;s pretty damn good. The movie&#x27;s climax is a lot less confusing than it is in the fi]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — It</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>FilmFan1983</strong> — <em>8 years ago(September 20, 2017 07:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Read the second draft by Cary and it's pretty damn good. The movie's climax is a lot less confusing than it is in the finished product since the new version removes so much context. We actually see Alvin Marsh die at the hands of Pennywise, we find out that the floating kids are in fact dead (something the final cut left too ambiguous) and we see Bill trick Georgie into revealing his true identity. Ben's character is more fleshed out and we actually see the reason why he turns on Bill after the Niebolt house scene. The relationship triangle with Ben, Bev, and Bill are better defined in the script. That script also emphasizes more subtle scares during the Niebolt house scene and is far more effective because of it. While the new movie tried to include more of the clown, I liked how in Cary's version, Pennywise could change into seemingly benevolent human form. It would have made the movie more unsettling and unpredictable. The kidnapping angle was an addition to the new script, and doesn't really make sense as Pennywise should want to divide the group and not band them together.<br />
Although the more recent draft did a good job of retaining the spirit, if not the content, of certain scenes, some more important scares were left off. In the second draft we see Pennywise possess Bev's dad in a chilling scene, actually get to see the first appearance of the deadlights at the bottom of the lake, and get to see Patrick return as a reanimated corpse.<br />
I'm not saying that that draft was perfect. The flashback scene explaining the origins of It feels narratively out of place, and the condensing of Richie and Stanley's character wasn't the best move, but with just a little more tweaking and reintroduction of Stanley, I think I would have preferred it to what we got. It's worth noting that the final draft did not improve on any of the fundamental weaknesses of the earlier drafts such as the overly broad characterizations of the adults and Mike and Stanley functioning more like background characters. The only good thing the film added (besides Stanley who was still present in the original draft) was more visual flair that wasn't evident in the earlier script.<br />
I'm a little nervous about the second one since so much of what made the movie work was because of Cary's input and as far as I know, he's not coming back in any creative capacity for part 2. The second will be more difficult to adapt as it is.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/249940/read-the-second-draft-by-cary-and-it-s-pretty-damn-good-the-movie-s-climax-is-a-lot-less-confusing-than-it-is-in-the-fi</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:53:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/249940.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:39 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Read the second draft by Cary and it&#x27;s pretty damn good. The movie&#x27;s climax is a lot less confusing than it is in the fi on Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jbaker1-2</strong> — <em>6 years ago(May 21, 2019 07:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I must have read the first draft, then, because the script I read was terrible. It bore almost no resemblance to the novel, and even changed the names of some of the principle characters for no good reason.<br />
There are 8.2 billion people in the world. 8.19 billion of them have never heard of and don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk. Get over it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2103118</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2103118</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Read the second draft by Cary and it&#x27;s pretty damn good. The movie&#x27;s climax is a lot less confusing than it is in the fi on Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WeirdRaptor</strong> — <em>8 years ago(January 13, 2018 02:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't care about what could have been. I only care that I enjoyed the product we got.<br />
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -Gandalf</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2103117</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2103117</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Read the second draft by Cary and it&#x27;s pretty damn good. The movie&#x27;s climax is a lot less confusing than it is in the fi on Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>marshmallow fairy</strong> — <em>8 years ago(September 25, 2017 11:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You have read early drafts of this screenplay? Where can these be found? I haven't seen this movie yet, but it could help me save $8.50 if I could just read the thing. Is this legal?<br />
I'm a little nervous about the second one since so much of what made the movie work was because of Cary's input and as far as I know, he's not coming back in any creative capacity for part 2. The second will be more difficult to adapt as it is.<br />
Does this movie set up a sequel?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2103116</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2103116</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Read the second draft by Cary and it&#x27;s pretty damn good. The movie&#x27;s climax is a lot less confusing than it is in the fi on Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chad-Dad-Basement</strong> — <em>8 years ago(September 21, 2017 02:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wait for Director's Cut</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2103115</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2103115</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:44:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>