You guys are insanethis is a hilarious thread!

Yeah but it should WAY below average.

The average rating on IMDB is 7. This means that a 6.2 indicates a bellow average movie score.
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

Wow - you need to stay WELL clear of Taken 3.
The only times you should risk it showing:

• Someone has burned your house down, you manage to find them, and have them tied up until the authorities arrive. You don't want to physically injure them for legal reasons, but a little torture is much needed. You can then show it to them.
• Aliens invade. They kidnap you, and tell you that they wish to terminate the earth, because they're jealous of any other talent existing in the universe. They demand that you prove that humans are untalented, to leave earth alone. Then, and only then, should you show them Taken 3.

Totally agree. I thought Taken 1 was rubbish, but this is even worse. I don't know why I watched it. Wooden acting (even Neeson), poorly filmed action scenes, corny scenes with his so called ex wife and HUGE plot holes.
My main problem? Neeson is 60!! He just doesn't cut it as an action hero.
I gave it 4/10.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

7.5 for me

8/10 from me; I think it actually underrated in all honesty. Its not as good as the first (or as emotional), but it still delivers its share of awesome moments, and I liked Rade Sherebedaga as the main antagonist Murad (thought it was a nice touch having him be related to Marco, the main kidnapper from the first).
"Speak of the Devil, and He shall appear."

This message has been deleted.

I like Liam Neeson very much. Taken was a good movie and I gave it 8/10. But taken 2 was a disappointment, with a poor plot and so many unacceptable mistakes. 3/10, this is what I gave Taken 2.

Yeah what's the OP talking about? This has a D, Godfather has an A. Sounds about right. What more do they want?
"What? Do you wanna just sit around and be wrong?" - Liz Lemon

There are movies that I really like that are less than 6.2. I just don't understand how it could be just two-tenths or so away from something like the Godfather.
The Godfather is at 9.2

The story sucks the acting is bland and boring to watch and worst of all, the action is filmed in such an amateurish and incomprehensible manner, so you have no idea what is going on!

I just watched it. It was horrible. 4/10
No way it was a 4/10 movie. The acting was generally ok ,although at times Liam Neeson bothers me with his personality being pretty corpse like, the story was easy to understand and although the bad guys made some stupid mistakes well I guess amateurs will make stupid mistakes but I gave this movie a 6/10 because I just found it hard to believe they would not make sure Liam Neeson didn't have that cellphone or other things on him when his wife in the movie and him were captured and left in that room.

I just watched it. It was horrible. 4/10

I think you've done a bad thing. GET ON THE NAUGHTY STEP.

Its partly my fault, I gave it an 8

Granted the film wasn't anywhere near as good as the first one, but I think you could give it a 5 or 6 just based on the Liam Neeson kicking ass scenes alone.