<![CDATA[Which would you prefer?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Red Dead Redemption

ginnyjinxedandhanshotritafirst — 13 years ago(December 12, 2012 05:30 PM)

Which would you prefer?
I don't think they can do another game without John. So maybe telling the story of him and his gang would make for a better game.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/250934/which-would-you-preferRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 09:46:51 GMTWed, 06 May 2026 00:47:27 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Which would you prefer? on Wed, 06 May 2026 00:47:29 GMT]]>alexvittorio-00926 — 9 years ago(May 17, 2016 07:54 PM)

I agree. A younger Landon would be a sight to see, but any throwback to this one should be subtle. Like the GTA franchise does. It should be on its own merit

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2111531https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2111531Wed, 06 May 2026 00:47:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which would you prefer? on Wed, 06 May 2026 00:47:28 GMT]]>briangcb — 13 years ago(December 12, 2012 06:29 PM)

That would be fun, but for me personally, I think the game being set in 1911, you can't really have a sequel because RDR basically was at the end of the old West. So a prequel would realistically be the only option (unless it was set the same year)
so I'd like to see a spiritual sequel or perhaps a game that takes place around 1876 and maybe have some cameos by younger versions of the characters
A young John Marston, Landon Ricketts, etc. but I think it'd be better to play as someone else. Maybe someone else in John's gang, so John will be in the whole game but it won't be restricted to his storyline.
Daggett: I've paid you a small fortune!
Bane: And this gives you power over me?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2111530https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2111530Wed, 06 May 2026 00:47:28 GMT