Hepocles said...
You are clutching at straws now. It's sad to watch
The correct answer to that quote is:
'He can if he is signed out'
That's the missing context - 'if he is signed out'
You are not smart enough to gaslight me, old bean. And you never will be.
You can grasp this thing if you really focus!
It's simple.
Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.

dbentley666 said...
You need to focus, dude. People who ramble on about context are usually doing damage control.
You fucked up.
It's simple. Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.
You are clutching at straws now. It's sad to watch
The correct answer to that quote is:
'He can if he is signed out'
That's the missing context - 'if he is signed out'
You are not smart enough to gaslight me, old bean. And you never will be.
Alba gu bràth

Hepocles said...
Repeating something doesn't make it anymore true the second time, old bean
What you are quoting is missing context around it - true or false?
You need to focus, dude. People who ramble on about context are usually doing damage control.
You ****ed up.
It's simple. Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.

dbentley666 said...
Just read this again and concentrate:
It's simple. Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.
Repeating something doesn't make it anymore true the second time, old bean
What you are quoting is missing context around it - true or false?
Alba gu bràth

Hepocles said...
If he can read your posts. Then he isn't signed in (loggedOut)
If he can't read your posts. Then he is signed in (loggedIn)
You are trying to use a direct quote without its context, old bean
You are not smart enough to gaslight me
You are barely smart enough to not shit your pants
Just read this again and concentrate:
It's simple. Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.

dbentley666 said...
You fucked up.
It's simple. Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.
If he can read your posts. Then he isn't signed in (loggedOut)
If he can't read your posts. Then he is signed in (loggedIn)
You are trying to use a direct quote without its context, old bean
You are not smart enough to gaslight me
You are barely smart enough to not **** your pants
Alba gu bràth

Hepocles said...
Yes… He can read them because they aren't blocked anymore. Because he isn't signed into the account that has them blocked. It's two different states you see: loggedIn|loggedOut
You can't be in both states in the same instance
Explain to me how your daft fucking analogy works again? What represents the blocking functionality?
How can you be a professor of English and not understand how analogies are supposed to work?
You ****ed up.
It's simple. Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.

dbentley666 said...
It's simple. Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.
Yes… He can read them because they aren't blocked anymore. Because he isn't signed into the account that has them blocked. It's two different states you see: loggedIn|loggedOut
You can't be in both states in the same instance
Explain to me how your daft ****ing analogy works again? What represents the blocking functionality?
How can you be a professor of English and not understand how analogies are supposed to work?
Alba gu bràth

Hepocles said...
Let us say you are determined to ignore someone.
According to you, when you are not in their presence, you have stopped ignoring them!
What a stupid old fool you are. Why are you boring me with this redundant garbage?
What represents the blocking functionality in this analogy?
It's simple. Even a retard like Bongo could grasp this.
You said: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
He can.

dbentley666 said...
Let’s try another analogy.
Let us say you are determined to ignore someone.
According to you, when you are not in their presence,
you have stopped ignoring them
!
See, this is why a university education is a good thing.
Without such an education, you are destined to have endless conversations with people like Azn about how stupid you are.
It's really simple.
You said to azn: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
Actually, he can!
expand
Let us say you are determined to ignore someone.
According to you, when you are not in their presence, you have stopped ignoring them!
What a stupid old fool you are. Why are you boring me with this redundant garbage?
What represents the blocking functionality in this analogy?
Alba gu bràth

Hepocles said...
Someone can be on block, but you can sign out and read their posts.
Yes because they aren't on block for you without being signed into an account. It's this simple fact that you can't grasp that makes all your following logic look stupid.
The signing out takes a second.
True but irrelevant to this argument
When you are signed out, they don’t cease to be on block.
When you sign out. You no longer, as a user, have the access to the block functionality. They do cease to be on block for you as you can see their posts now. Simple stuff right?
When you turn off the ignition on your car, it doesn’t cease to be a functioning car.
It is simply a car you are not using.
expand
Let’s try another analogy.
Let us say you are determined to ignore someone.
According to you, when you are not in their presence,
you have stopped ignoring them
!
See, this is why a university education is a good thing.
Without such an education, you are destined to have endless conversations with people like Azn about how stupid you are.
It's really simple.
You said to azn: He can't have you on block and still read your posts, ya mongo.
Actually, he can!

dbentley666 said...
Read this carefully, retard:
Someone can be on block, but you can sign out and read their posts.
The signing out takes a second.
When you are signed out, they don’t cease to be on block.
When you turn off the ignition on your car, it doesn’t cease to be a functioning car.
It is simply a car you are not using.
Someone can be on block, but you can sign out and read their posts.
Yes because they aren't on block for you without being signed into an account. It's this simple fact that you can't grasp that makes all your following logic look stupid.
The signing out takes a second.
True but irrelevant to this argument
When you are signed out, they don’t cease to be on block.
When you sign out. You no longer, as a user, have the access to the block functionality. They do cease to be on block for you as you can see their posts now. Simple stuff right?
When you turn off the ignition on your car, it doesn’t cease to be a functioning car.
It is simply a car you are not using.
Alba gu bràth

Hepocles said...
Once you sign out your account… there is no blocking functionality. Nobody is on block at all then
Very simple stuff. You are just being stubborn because you are now humiliated.
When you turn off the ignition on your car, it doesn’t cease to be a functioning car.
Nobody is claiming that the website stops functioning when you sign out of it. Only that the functionality for blocking isn't present, in this instance.
What a stupid fucking analogy. Did you really think that was applicable here?
expand
Read this carefully, retard:
Someone can be on block, but you can sign out and read their posts.
The signing out takes a second.
When you are signed out, they don’t cease to be on block.
When you turn off the ignition on your car, it doesn’t cease to be a functioning car.
It is simply a car you are not using.

dbentley666 said...
Someone can be on block, but you can sign out and read their posts.
The signing out takes a second.
When you are signed out, they don’t cease to be on block.
When you turn off the ignition on your car, it doesn’t cease to be a functioning car.
It is simply a car you are not using.
God, you're so much dumber than Bongo! Even Azn makes you look like a dead turd.
expand
Once you sign out your account… there is no blocking functionality. Nobody is on block at all then
Very simple stuff. You are just being stubborn because you are now humiliated.
When you turn off the ignition on your car, it doesn’t cease to be a functioning car.
Nobody is claiming that the website stops functioning when you sign out of it. Only that the functionality for blocking isn't present, in this instance.
What a stupid ****ing analogy. Did you really think that was applicable here?
Alba gu bràth

Hepocles said...
Then that someone isn't on block when you are signed out.
The blocking functionality is only present when you are logged into the account that set it
You muddled old fool.
Someone can be on block, but you can sign out and read their posts.
The signing out takes a second.
When you are signed out, they don’t cease to be on block.
When you turn off the ignition on your car, it doesn’t cease to be a functioning car.
It is simply a car you are not using.
God, you're so much dumber than Bongo! Even Azn makes you look like a dead turd.

Then that someone isn't on block when you are signed out.
The blocking functionality is only present when you are logged into the account that set it
You muddled old fool.
Alba gu bràth

The analogy didn't work?
Someone can be on block, but you can sign out and read their posts.
Capisce, moron?

You thick ****
For all to see
Alba gu bràth

So if you go to sleep your retarded family ceases to exist??????

At that moment you can't, retard.
Then they aren't on block for you are they? You need to be signed into an account for that to be true.
This is some of the dumbest **** I have ever read on here
To think you posted this is a 'gotcha' too
Alba gu bràth

At that moment you can't, retard.
It's a lot like going to sleep. When you wake up the bedroom is still there, right?