Not only stupid but unethical. You're gloating over the murder of a scientist? You think this will improve Israel's standing in the world? or America's? As Erica pointed out, the moron Trump pulled out of negotiations with Iran that would have effectively blocked Iran's nuclear capabilities being deployed. The man is responsible for literally thousands of deaths, and fools like you are enabling him.

Nothing is more simplistic than the argument "things aren't black and white, therefore you're wrong."
A scientist is dead because sensible people know that Biden's administration can't be trusted not to act as an enabler for an Iranian nuke. That's a fact.

Oh yes. Very black and white simplistic narrative about one of the most complex regions of the world.
but thats right wing for ya. a world in black and white.
and in b4, "yeah but the left wants Iran to have nuclear weapons and give them money and stuff."
No one wants Iran to have nuclear weapons.
Thats not a left wing vs right wing. But you can choose to do this via negations and partnership, or you can do it via proxy warfare. the latter hasn't exactly worked wonders in the middle east so far. But do go ahead a make yourself look like the simplistic tool we all already take you for.
pwned.
kill yourself.
Thats it, I’m going to clown college

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

Nobody in this thread is confused other than you. You said something incredibly stupid and everybody else in this thread agrees that it’s stupid and is telling you so.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

There's nothing ambiguous about what I've said. You're either trolling or severely lacking in skills of comprehension. Either way, that's your problem, not mine.

To be fair, OP was quite confused and ambiguous. What were you trying to say?

Blaming a candidate who isn’t President yet for something that happened under a Trump Administration because of Trump’s neglect of Iran’s quickly rising Nuclear program.
You've misunderstood my post and the issues surrounding the Iran nuclear program, all while using a self-congratulatory tone. Well done. That's a special kind of stupid.

How empty is your life that you have to ridicule the death of someone’s daughter?
Jesus Christ.
This place shouldn’t exist.
Hep: "I'll post a topless picture if you do the same ;)"

Your username is in poor taste
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana

This message has been deleted.

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

OP pwned!
suck it.

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

Blaming a candidate who isn’t President yet for something that happened under a Trump Administration because of Trump’s neglect of Iran’s quickly rising Nuclear program.
Righties are truly brainwashed. Did Tucker Carlson write this for you?
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

Only a right wing nimrod could use college attendance as an insult. Being uneducated is a badge of honor to you folks.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

Also, Japan was poised to surrender, mainly because they were terrified of a Russian invasion. This was communicated to Truman, and he said he objected to treating with Japan because of one clause: they insisted that the Emperor not be treated as a war criminal. Truman rejected this (he wanted unconditional surrender). In the event, the Emperor was not tried, and lived out his life peacefully. So why did Truman decide on the bomb? Modern historians argue that he wanted to scare the Russians. Killing off thousands of Japanese civilians was in order to kick-start the Cold War.
After the bomb was dropped, America realized they had a PR problem, and they decided to spin it i the direction of "we did it to save countless American lives." It was the kind of crap we nowadays expect from Republican hoodlums.

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

Japan is still trying to recover from that. It’s one of the biggest war atrocities ever committed. And it wasn’t necessary as the Pacific war had been going for 4 years in 1945 and Japan was getting their asses handed to them by the Allies on both ground and naval fronts.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

Yes, that's the really beautiful part. We destroyed two cities, with huge civilian populations, in such a way that deformed babies were being born decades later and various kinds of cancer were rampant, in order to save lives! Imagine what they would do if they wanted to actually
take
lives…

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

His argument is based entirely in “what if’s” , speculations and projections, yet he’s claiming lefties argue through feelings. He also thinks dropping two nuclear weapons on Japan somehow saved millions of lives by vaporizing two cities full of innocent people.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

You're an even bigger ****ing moron than that Cuck guy, and I actually thought that wasn't possible!
It's entirely possible they wouldn't have used it, you klutz! Did you know that Hitler studied American racist policies to get his Aryan supremacist agenda off the ground? And that he decided they couldn't go as far as the Americans had gone? So yes, Germany might not have used the bomb. In any case, Americans developed the capability first, and despite the fact that 85% of scientists and virtually all the generals advocated against it, Truman decided to use the bomb to display his macho qualities.
If America has nuclear capacity, so should Iran. They should all stop having the bomb, you idiot, especially with clowns like Trump in power.
Invasion of Japan would have cost less lives. All intelligent historians agree on that.
Get off your Iran trip. Look at American insanity vis a vis nukes.

Every time I encounter a lefty I'm reminded of Jonathan Haight's work. He's bang on the money; y'all have screws missing. You can't think, you can only 'feel'. It's impossible for those of us with the power to use logic to understand how you can arrive at most of your conclusions. Ask yourself why the only way you think you can understand ours is to think 'racism'.
Look, for the sake of argument, I'll grant you everything you've asserted above (although it's mostly idiotic!). Now, answer these questions.
If Germany, Russia or Japan had developed the bomb first, would they not have used it?
Should Iran have nuclear weapons?
Would you prefer America didn't have a proven nuclear detergent while Russia has it?
Do you think an invasion of Japan would cost more or less lives than the bombs?
Do you think that if Iran was developing a nuclear bomb they would allow weapons inspectors to know about it?

What a stupid argument. We used it first because someone else would have used it before us. They should have used it, if they were going to use it at all, on Germany, not Japan. That would have made sense. The "millions of lives" argument is bullshit. Eisenhower was furious that they used it, and claimed they were already wrapping up the war. MacArthur and Leahy also opposed the use of the bomb. They used it to show they had the power, and for racist reasons.

If we weren't the first, someone else would have been. Thankfully we stopped at using them on one country to save millions of lives. I can only imagine what would have happened had Germany or Russia won the race.
You sound like you have never stepped outside of a college campus. You have that naive hippy commune vibe about you.

𝐸𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝑅𝑒𝓃𝑒—𝒫𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑒

OP somehow forgot Trump is still President and he’s the one who pulled out of the Iran deal like a college boy who can’t afford Plan B.
"You had me at Elk Tartare"
-Erin Wotherspoon

America should dismantle its nuclear programme. Americans are the only people ever to have used nuclear weapons against other human beings. Clearly the last people to be trusted with nuclear weapons. Especially with the moron Trump in charge.