I agree, it was definitely problematic. Design-wise I would have bought 30 years into the future, but not 150. This is not about flying cars and hoverboards - it's idiotic to think that the design of literally everything in the world won't change at least slightly in one and a half centuries, just look at how much it changed in the last 30 years.

Some tech would realistically advance as we can see but its a dystopic future, a realistic future really.. overpopulation and flawed financial institutions.. the cars and computers were next generation or modified but not as advanced as you'd think..things wouldn't be as radically different as flying cars and all this clean technology, somethings would have gotten worse also.

I am pretty sure when Back to The Future came, everyone taught we would have flying cars by 2015. So wtf don't we??? Save concept can apply here.not everything have to be futuristic. Shm!! I still got a beep razor phone that worksShm!!

Most likely due to product placements.
True but most companies at least attempt to "futurize" their products in such movies. A good example would be the product placements in the first two
Back to the Future
movies. This movie didn't really try.

Most likely due to product placements.

You have a good point there my friend