I've already explained myself good enough. If you think that acknowledging sin is mental abuse, if you think that straight people thinking gay stuff is gross is mental abuse you are wrong.
Simply thinking it would be no issue, no one has any right to what other people think, but the sad fact is that many people discriminate against or put down people they do not agree with (interesting you bring up specifically homosexuals, you would have been better picking a group that is not currently being vilified), getting told you are an abomination, that you will spend eternity in hell, being the but of jokes, scared of getting beaten up because someone cannot accept how you are (I will not go into actually getting beaten, that is clearly physical) these are things that cause actual real world harm but apparently you think they shoudl just get over it.
Not a great Christian attitude I would have said, does Jesus not say that love is the greatest commandment?
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain

Bigotry is more than just giving people hurt feelings and your brushing it aside as a simple 'someone does not like you' is pretty harsh.
I didn't say it was. However, I don't believe views on sin are bigotry to begin with.
Going through life being told you are wrong because of a fundamental part of your personality is abusive, and yet you appear to be blaming the victim here.
Who goes through life like that?
The answer: very few in non-sucky countries.
If one seeks out the "abuse" against them, then it can't help but to reveal that they may be damaged goods.
Most people will avoid/ignore the conflict altogether rather than run to it shouting "It's not fair that you don't like me!"
If they are truly being discriminated against (The scant few bakers out there that won't bake a wedding cake for example), it's silly to pretend they have no course of action to resolve that.
But again, no one is under any obligation to make them feel better about themselves. The pursuit of happiness is their own responsibility and they need to learn pursue that despite adversity rather than expecting the elimination of it.
It's easy. I do it all the time.
Feel free to tell me I have the wrong end of the stick, but this is what I am reading from what you are saying.
I've already explained myself good enough. If you think that acknowledging sin is mental abuse, if you think that straight people thinking gay stuff is gross is mental abuse you are wrong.
There are clearly other things going on in that person's life that perhaps you don't wish to discuss or don't know.
If that is all there is, then they have a mental problem that most other people don't experience when they face contrary views.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too.

Bigotry is more than just giving people hurt feelings and your brushing it aside as a simple 'someone does not like you' is pretty harsh.
Going through life being told you are wrong because of a fundamental part of your personality is abusive, and yet you appear to be blaming the victim here.
Feel free to tell me I have the wrong end of the stick, but this is what I am reading from what you are saying.
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain

If you are mentally abused just because someone doesn't like you, then yes you are weak minded.
That would be gagreel.
Don't twist it into anything more than that because you can't.
He hasn't even begun to twist bruh.

If you are mentally abused just because someone doesn't like you, then yes you are weak minded.
Don't twist it into anything more than that because you can't.
In any event, whatever advocates for these kinds of "mentally abused" people are, they need to encourage them to brush their shoulders off and live life to the potential they automatically have in non-sucky countries.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too.

a reflection of how weak minded the person offended may be.
They should man up
So victims of mental abuse should just harden up? I mean that is the logical conclusion of what you are writing.
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain

but I don't think you're not a bad person or a spiteful one.
I respectfully disagree. S/he's full of spite against his/her ideological "enemies".
All lined up - get your ducks in a row.

I know you didn't mean any harm Goz. I know we've argued a lot, but I don't think you're not a bad person or a spiteful one.
I'm just trying to point out that you're kinda making an assumption that doesn't help you. It is entirely possible that his position is informed by racism he has suffered that makes him consider not getting a cake to be too "first World" to be bothered about.
It is also entirely possible he hasn't.
they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I didn't know that, butt surely the principles remain the same?
He is a little delusional about religion but I have always found him a worthy poster and sometimes quite funny.
I was more pertinently referring to gay and transgender people butt I take your point and meant no harm.
All I could then say, it that he should know that even if it has not happened to him personally butt in his community?
I am an equal rights poster.

I believe Smith is a black American. I would be careful saying he has never faced discrimination that affected his job or whatever.
they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

Where did I mention a black American?
All I mentioned was a black poodle.
Perhaps you are confused?

Are you confidently making the above claims about a black American?
they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I don't think you have been vilified when it means your job, marital status, where and how you live, your status in society and which clubs or whatever you can join is as a result of vilification and prejudice.
You should at the same time be relived and respectful of those you have.

So you think that being vilified by a group of people is inconsequential, even if this vilification is illegal?(cake and wedding licence instances)
Yes.
You can get a wedding cake anywhere. It's illegal like speeding and pot smoking is illegal. Harmless to all thing but feelings.
And yet you can force a baker to make them, meaning that even that isn't causing harm except to dwell on the notion that the baker doesn't want to bake a cake for gay people. in other words, people aren't even happy with the fact that they can force a person to do something for them.
Hurt feelings.
They should get over it and bask in their superiority.
Those homosexuals and other groups should just 'man up' and 'turn the other cheek'?
They aren't required to turn the other cheek.
They can be as mad and bitter as they want to be, but it is a waste of life to wonder what an evangelical thinks of you.
It's not a requirement for anyone to like anybody &/or their actions. It is perfectly fine to be disgusted by gay stuff except for how it makes the gay person feel and I don;t know why that is relevant to the gay person.
As surprising as this sounds, there's probably a person or two who doesn't like me for any number of reasons- valid or not.
I still manage to sleep well at night.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too.

So you think that being vilified by a group of people is inconsequential, even if this vilification is illegal?(cake and wedding licence instances)
Those homosexuals and other groups should just 'man up' and 'turn the other cheek'?
Why the beep should they have to, due to persecution and bigotry?

You're talking about hurt feelings which is both perfectly legal to cause and also more a reflection of how weak minded the person offended may be.
They should man up and realize that it is not the world's obligation to only believe things they believe.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too.

No butt they cause harm by being bigoted to others by the enforcing og their views!

Aren't you forgetting about psychological harm?
There isn't any unless you are already crazyOr an abusive family.
Being fundamentalist is not harmful in and of itself. There's more than enough happy ones to prove that.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too.

Aren't you forgetting about psychological harm?
What about homosexuals and otheres who are vilified by 'Fundamentalist Christians'?

If I were you, I'd wanna be me too.

Ignore
smithjgs
AbsolutelyThoughtfulGoz

I'll put it another way.
If your religious beliefs tell you to harm others, then you should expect to be killed.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too.

There's nothing wrong with being whatever you believe as long as no physical harm is caused to others which is why your rationale is silly.
Humans have been causing each other physical harm since Cain killed his brother 6,000 years ago, and that's never going to change until this world passes away. God did command his followers (Jews) to kill in His name prior to Jesus' atonement for sin, but once that was done salvation was opened to all of mankind. True Christians have never physically harmed anyone and never will. Islam on the other hand is a demonic religion that commands it's followers to rape and kill in the name of their false god.

There's nothing wrong with being whatever you believe as long as no physical harm is caused to others
This is also troothy.
(
.
)(
.
)
(
.
)(
.
)
.