(SNoW) — 1 week ago(March 21, 2026 08:39 PM)

This is what happens when writers get so pumped up by their own hype. This movie spends its entirety blowing smoke up it's own ass just as the last two seasons did and forgets to tell a story worth watching.
It felt like a seasons worth of content rammed into an hour and fifty minutes and Paul Anderson's absence felt jarring.
Barry Keoghan delivered a Razzie worthy performance.
Steven Knight was so disappointed by his own ending to the show, he immediately wrote a follow up that was somehow considerably worse. It's like he ignored everything that happened in the finale…
Tommy discovering he wasn't dying and finding relief in it.
Blowing up his home, faking his death and giving himself a new start.
Even Arthur's final words for Tommy in the show, ""Where you’re going Tommy, there will I be. Very soon. Love Arthur". Believing him to be dead, he intended to follow Tommy even in death which was reflective of the relationship we'd seen across 6 seasons of the show. Only to find that Tommy killed him cus he was drunk and sick of him.
I feel like we missed an entire seasons worth of content where Tommy returned to small heath with Arthur head of the PB as shown at the end of season 6. Arthur believing Tommy to be dead, Tommy's spiraling alcohol abuse and Arthurs spiraling drug abuse causes them to finally come to blows.
Paul Anderson said he doesn't understand why they did a movie instead of another couple seasons and I couldn't agree more. The show was never the same after the political landscape of early 1900's Britain went from being the backdrop of the show to the forefront in season 5 but it would still have been better to have 2 more substandard seasons than a dog **** movie.
End of rant.