<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Not a bad film at all!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Skyline</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jh66</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 09, 2013 03:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This was far better than I'd been led to believe it was here.<br />
The only major storyline criticism was that it was 'only LA' that was suffering, even though there were no media signals, broadcasts or contacts, it would have been a more fleshed out story to have had initial worldwide TV news broadcasts in the early stages (and throughout), rather than just the end shots of London, etc.<br />
It was fantasy, sure, and not the greatest film ever, but it was way better than Independence Day etc?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/253743/not-a-bad-film-at-all</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:07:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/253743.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:28:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Not a bad film at all! on Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151763</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151763</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Not a bad film at all! on Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Rena_Mahone</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 26, 2015 07:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This film has one major flaw - it does not appeal to idiots and they are a substantial proportion of any audience. If you plan to make a film for a mainstream audience, you have to take into account all the potential viewers who just want to sit through 90 minutes of inanity. I am afraid the makers of Skyline were too busy trying to make a good film to remember this.<br />
Exactly. Those who hated Skyline are most certainly also the ones who adored idiotic found footage garbage, such as Cloverfield and Paranormal Activity.<br />
Boycott movies that involve real animal violence (&amp; their directors)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151762</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151762</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Not a bad film at all! on Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>philipjcowan-119-646602</strong> — <em>12 years ago(October 06, 2013 05:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This film has one major flaw - it does not appeal to idiots and they are a substantial proportion of any audience. If you plan to make a film for a mainstream audience, you have to take into account all the potential viewers who just want to sit through 90 minutes of inanity. I am afraid the makers of Skyline were too busy trying to make a good film to remember this.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151761</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151761</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Not a bad film at all! on Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>badgerking10</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 14, 2013 07:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I found it perfectly watchable The special effects were very good. Though, the story - as far as it went - served the special effects and, of course, special effects should always serve the story For this type of film, it had a peculiarly long set-up at the beginning, but still completely failed to make me care about any of the characters I suppose the end left room for some hope, but was really quite depressing So, generally, it was OK, but needed more of a story and more engaging characters.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151760</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151760</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Not a bad film at all! on Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>montyburns56</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 10, 2013 08:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah. It wasn't a masterpiece by any means, but it was an enjoyable piece of B-movie guff. And it's certainly no worse/sillier than Independence Day.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151759</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151759</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Not a bad film at all! on Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jono777</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 09, 2013 10:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I tend to agree, the movie wasn't great but it wasn't pure crap either. It is underrated by a least 1 point.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151758</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2151758</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>