The average atheist is more intelligent than the average believer, which is why they are able to commit white collar crimes and get away with it

Atheism doesn't play well with fellow inmates (who will be mostly Christians, even if drawn from a cross section of the population), and as graham mentioned, people can use religion to try and manipulate the parole board into clemency.
So the figures probably aren't quite as good as the ones published; but atheism is known to correlate with higher intelligence and intelligence has a negative correlation with propensity to criminal activity. So I expect that if all the confounding factors could be taken away, atheists would still be significantly less predisposed to crime.
It could be a balloon. It could be Franky. It could be very fresh and clean. It could be those ways.

But is that actually because atheists commit less crime? Or might there be other factors?
For example, "I am an atheist" does not sound good to parole boards. Whereas "I've found god and given my life over the jesus" does.
Perhaps that could explain the numbers just as well?
If I could stop a rapist from raping a child I would. That's the difference between me and god.

You'll continue to pretend to be completely oblivious as to how your post disproves most of your racist, alt-right bullsh!t.

Hunters have a perverted gun fetish, so sayeth a terrorist supporting kiddie-fiddler.

It just means that they're better at not getting caught

I don't really like this argument.
If there's one thing religion is good at, it's being a coping mechanism. And if there's one thing that would require a lot of coping, it's having your freedom taken away.
Do the polls that people reference when they say stuff like this take into account the likelihood of someone in prison identifying as the predominant religion just to avoid the extra hassle and pressure their fellow inmates might place on them if they out themselves as an "other?"
And given how mistrusted atheists are, it wouldn't surprise me to learn if people who were generally non-religious take up the practice in prison so that they can look like good, upstanding, rehabilitated citizens.

The important points to consider are:
What kind of economic background atheists have and what kind of social and economic backgrounds theists have. Which countries figures you have quoted and which agency provided the data.

You reach, I teach
James Harden

Or maybe they weren't. After all, being criminals didn't prevent members of the Mafia for example in believing in God.

Good point Miscella!
You're aware her avatar is of a porn star, right? and you call men sexist?

Good point Miscella!

Perhaps they were atheists
before
they were incarcerated. After all, if there's a better place for introspection than prison, I'm not aware of it.

I think part of the reasoning behind that is because atheists don't believe in an afterlife, so they don't want spend the few years they have on this planet rotting in prison, where as the theist perspective just see this as a temporary realm, so the threat of jail isn't quite as severe.
You're standing on my neck

Theophobiacs and believers agree!
Realityphobiacs agree with whatever position supports the cray-cray. The passive-aggressive camp is optional, though.
The destruction of the wicked is literal and as a collective they make up the heavens and the earth that people think don't change.

Wait, are you saying prisoners aren't representative of the prisoner population..?
Are you saying prisoners would never lie?
~~
Matthew 15:14

1. Prisoners are a small percentage of the whole population and are rarely a representation of the whole anyway.
   Wait, are you saying prisoners aren't representative of the prisoner population..?
   Never trust a black man named "Chip."

That's on;y because it's smart for prisoners to get religion.
It's a silly argument anyway since this only shows 2 things.

1. Prisoners are a small percentage of the whole population and are rarely a representation of the whole anyway.
2. They likely aren't in there by doing religious things. So the argument is basically the same ones the religious have. They were being hypocritical.
   Theophobiacs and believers agree!
   If this is Locke, then who's in there?

It could just be one of those words that you'd recognize if you heard it, but it doesn't click when you're just reading it.

monicaxoxo:
Why do you guys on here always have to use fancy terms?
I seriously had to look up what incarcerated meant.
I have probably looked up the meaning of
incarceration
in the past myself, but I am a Finn.
Isn't it good these guys use "fancy terms" so we may learn more English language?
I was surprised to see someone whose first language is English finds
incarcerated
a fancy term, but perhaps it is.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

Do you believe RNA chains less than 40 links can build themselves up against the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
This sentence doesn't even make sense. Even you should have long abandoned the claim that anything about evolution violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. But I realize that you have trouble grasping the concept of that big yellow shiny thing in the sky during daylight hours.

Hunters have a perverted gun fetish, so sayeth a terrorist supporting kiddie-fiddler.

Arlon sir I did pass biology
What year was that?
Do you believe RNA chains less than 40 links can build themselves up against the Second Law of Thermodynamics? Do you realize that never happens?
~~
Matthew 15:14

Arlon sir I did pass biology though didn't score as highly in it as I did in maths.

You reach, I teach
James Harden

lmgtfy.com
I saw no figures for Jews in prison on that site. On my own search I found that the number of Jews in prison has increased since 2002, but no actual percentages. Remember also what I said about prisoners lying.
What I do know for a certain fact is that you failed biology 101. Most people on the internet failed biology 101. Kitzmiller v. Dover is the "law" in a manner of speaking still because most people failed biology 101.
~~
Matthew 15:14