<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Here is the main problem IMO,]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Now You See Me</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>stonekeeper_ever</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 29, 2015 02:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The scene with the car crash on the bridge: Dylan Stayed near the car while it was on fire until seconds before it exploded and sent him rolling over the hood of his own car. Since he knew that was part of the trick the only reason he risked his life is to fool us. This plus the part where he fights Franco plus the scene where he shoots his gone and the girl push his arm plus the scene where he gets angry drunk = Too much bull crap just to fool us.<br />
Could have been 7/10 if the end did not take us for dummies.<br />
Final score: 6/10<br />
Excuse my English, I am French-Canadian</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254561/here-is-the-main-problem-imo</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 03:00:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254561.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Here is the main problem IMO, on Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>stonekeeper_ever</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 30, 2016 09:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think he could've played his game way smarter. He definitely did not need to do all those extreme actions. Especially walking near a car about to explode.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2159631</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2159631</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Here is the main problem IMO, on Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>federicodesilets</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 30, 2016 09:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">While these actions do enable the audience to assume they know the role he is playing, he is doing all the things to sell his role to the other characters in the film. I don't really think this is that complicated.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2159630</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2159630</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Here is the main problem IMO, on Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ellscashncarry</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 29, 2016 05:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Absolutely nailed it. This is my major issue too There were far too many scenes (such as those you mentioned) which, given we now n know who Mark Ruffallo's character really is, don't actually make sense, but were included to throw us off the scent.<br />
I'm sure the filmmakers might argue this was part of their own misdirection to us the viewer, but I'm not convinced that was their actual intention.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2159629</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2159629</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Here is the main problem IMO, on Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>markfilipak</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 14, 2016 07:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">stonekeeper_ever wrote:<br />
I am French-Canadian<br />
Well, make up your mind.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">I don't have a dog. And furthermore, my dog doesn't bite. And furthermore, you provoked him.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2159628</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2159628</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:25:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>