Why the hell are you repeating this? The "gay advocates" addressed this study in detail. I even went back and forth with you about it. Meanwhile, gadreel has asked you the same question about half-a-dozen times and you've ignored it.
In the event you have him on Ignore, here's his very pertinent question: "How do you feel about the studies own admission that the sample size was so small and the unaccounted for factors so prevalent that nothing could be reasonably drawn from the study in terms of actual conclusions?"
You seem to leave this highly relevant point out of what "facts" you think the study states. Nevermind conveniently ignoring the dozens of studies that say differently.
warriorspirit
: if the penis is used as a pencil holder we'll incur a cost.

maybe you should read the study, they actually say it, once again this is not a case of me wanting to believe anything other than the truth.
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain

that nothing could be reasonably drawn from the study in terms of actual conclusions?
And so you feel reassured why do you so desperately want to believe that?
Laws are silent in times of War - Cicero

How do you feel about the studies own admission that the sample size was so small and the unaccounted for factors so prevalent that nothing could be reasonably drawn from the study in terms of actual conclusions?
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain

The gay advocates sure are quiet now. hmm.
I guess they can't claim there's "no difference" between same sex parents and opposite sex parents anymore. The facts say everything.
I have no interest in refraining from my dishonesty and stupidity.
-Cash

How do you feel about the studies own admission that the sample size was so small and the unaccounted for factors so prevalent that nothing could be reasonably drawn from the study in terms of actual conclusions?
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain

It says you assh!les constantly shrieking about how their parents are going to hell or how they should be killed has an effect.
I didn't say it mentioned homosexuality. I said it condemned homosexuality.

I have no interest in refraining from my dishonesty and stupidity.
-Cash

No need to be sorry at all - the reason I'm pointing to Breitbart is the presentation of a study about which the author himself has stated "I agree that its a small sample, and the results should be interpreted with caution." - like ThinkProgress, Mother Jones, etc., it plays up verbiage and uses such studies for click bait instead of reporting.
There's a scarcity of good data on same sex parenting as of yet, one of the reasons being data sets for the results of same sex parenting are still generally taken from 1995 onward, when actually becoming a same sex parents was a battle in and of itself in most areas, there was a higher degree of social hostility, marriage was still denied, etc.
I wasn't even thinking of the open access nature of the journal - more the author's words of caution in both interviews and his own intro, along with Breitbart's added "flair".
"I can use stage combat in a real life fight, right?" - Blade

Sorry Cine, but regardless of the fact that the OP links to Breitbart where a decidedly unscientific spin is to be expected, the study itself comes from a credible source and shows exactly what it is reported to show. Eva brought up one possible factor and another would be the quality of open-access journals. However, that last one would require bringing into question numerous studies on a wide-range of topics.

"An aversion to homosexuality is called heterosexuality." - ErJen

The difference between scientific studies and the people who rely on them to push an agenda - a truly scientific study has no agenda.
QFT
warriorspirit
: if the penis is used as a pencil holder we'll incur a cost.

The difference between scientific studies and the people who rely on them to push an agenda - a truly scientific study has no agenda.

"An aversion to homosexuality is called heterosexuality." - ErJen

Let's compare their discussion/conclusion of that study to some of what's been said in this thread. Them:
Interpretation of these limited small-sample findings is necessarily speculative the very small size of the sample of children raised by lesbians imposes important limits and prompts great caution regarding the conclusions of this study. As with all observational studies, causal inference is not possible. Moreover, many subtle distinctions and pathways of influence simply cannot be addressed with only 20 cases, and unobserved differences between the parent comparison groups may well confound some or all of the child differences observed For these reasons, the findings of this study should be considered only provisional and exploratory until and unless they are confirmed by further research.
As initial results, the present findings should be interpreted with caution and balance, based on the limited evidence presented, and (it is hoped) neither exaggerated nor dismissed out of hand on preconceived ideological grounds.
You:
I guess they can't claim there's "no difference" between same sex parents and opposite sex parents anymore. The facts say everything.
Because children need a mother and father. It's a fact.
Jose:
Making a child grow up without a male and female role model is inherently abusive. Science. So even "good" gay parents are not good parents.
Hmmm, I'm detecting a substantial difference here.
warriorspirit
: if the penis is used as a pencil holder we'll incur a cost.

There's simply no way the website
that gave us "Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy" and "Media strangely silent on Hillary's health"
would present a skewed anything.
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/drt/2016/2410392/
You were saying?
I have no interest in refraining from my dishonesty and stupidity.
-Cash

There's simply no way the website that gave us "Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy" and "Media strangely silent on Hillary's health" would present a skewed anything.
Jezebel, Breitbart, Motherjones, The Blaze, Slate - these are just where thinking people get their news!
"I can use stage combat in a real life fight, right?" - Blade

The study in the OP could easily be skewed and ungenuine.
Nope but nice try.
I have no interest in refraining from my dishonesty and stupidity.
-Cash

The study in the OP could easily be skewed and ungenuine.

The gay advocates sure are quiet now. hmm.
I guess they can't claim there's "no difference" between same sex parents and opposite sex parents anymore. The facts say everything.
I have no interest in refraining from my dishonesty and stupidity.
-Cash

Maybe they're depressed at all the multitudes of other kids being raised improperly in traditional homes and they try to fill that void with ice cream?
Never trust a black man named "Chip."

Absolutely right!

Because children need a mother and father. It's a fact.
I have no interest in refraining from my dishonesty and stupidity.
-Cash

How do you feel about the studies own admission that the sample size was so small and the unaccounted for factors so prevalent that nothing could be reasonably drawn from the study in terms of actual conclusions?
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain

triggered. Facts are a tough thing to swallow.
I have no interest in refraining from my dishonesty and stupidity.
-Cash

Was there a control group?
§«
Ȥ