But those people wouldn't necessarily be standing up for freedom of speech under other circumstances.
I'm not in favour of political correctness, no matter which group is intended to 'benefit' from it. In my opinion, political correctness appoints one group as the benevolent guardians and protectors of the other. If the goal is for everyone to feel like equals; the worst thing that you can do is to elevate heterosexual whites to the role of guardians protecting the poor vulnerable sexual and racial minorities against mere words (and if you are a white heterosexual male, you're quite rightly supposed to stop being emotionally wounded by words at round about the age of 8).
It could be a balloon. It could be Franky. It could be very fresh and clean. It could be those ways.

Just make room for the Ramadan display.
And an Auditors Day display, a Throw the Jew Down the Well well, etc.
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com:443/data.filmboards/images/upload/AFDi0vg.png

The ones that annoy me the most are giving up long held traditions and celebrations because someone might not agree with said tradition and get offended therefor we should just give up our culture and tradition because of the "offended". I recently read a story about a town in Italy that was not going to display the nativity scene around Christmas because a non-Christmas celebrater may be offended. Idiots that decide things like this should be beaten.
Lamar Jackson for Heisman!

This message has been deleted.

It's stupid to tweet anything on Twitter.

I don't see it.

This message has been deleted.

I don't understand how they can sign a petition that rails against racist trolling in defense of this guy when he was literally racist trolling himself. And aren't these college SJW types the ones who repeat the "freedom of speech isn't freedom from consequences" refrain whenever
they're
the ones trying to get someone fired for saying something they disagree with?

One of my other opinions is that SJWs are super-attuned to irony and context, and never pounce on any opportunity to fabricate outrage at dubious examples of some -ism. If someone else "ironically" called for the genocide of some other group, SJWs would definitely jump to their defence. The only possible harm from these type of comments stigmatising white people is definitely only if they're literal.

Thats true, there is also the fact that the UK doesn't have a Diversity Minister as well.
I'm guessing he is an American, since he used England not Britain.

There's a huge difference between a government minister and a university representative.
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.

I think he is confusing Bahar Mustapha, the women who faced "hate crime" charges for tweeting that kind of crap. She was the Diversity Officer at Goldsmiths.

England's diversity minister tweeted "Kill all white males".
Really?
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.

England's diversity minister
Doesn't exist as that is a made up position.

Yeah, Moon. That's what I was saying. Run with that.
"I can use stage combat in a real life fight, right?" - Blade

So he was just "spoofing" the alt Right too?

Professor Noel Ignatiev
This is like watching an alt-right virgin stumble on his first Stormfront thread on nationalism. You're so new and fresh. Welcome to 1999.
"I can use stage combat in a real life fight, right?" - Blade

It is on Stormfront, Breitbart comment sections, more than a couple alt-righty reddit forums, areas of 4chan, etc. That's the crowd he's spoofing.
What? Don't look at me, I just hang out there to see what they're jawing about.
Professor Noel Ignatiev called for the "abolition of the white race". England's diversity minister tweeted "Kill all white males". You're familiar enough with the alt right to know about "white genocide" but know familiar enough to know where it came from?

Yeah, it's on Twitter too. Remember the furore when trump retweeted some dubious crime stats from a user call whitegenocide?
"Whether homosexuality causes less harm (than slavery) is debatable" -
Hada

"Probably, although I think the problem lies more in the clamp-on-controversy gripping universities by the throat in the age of students driving policy and people not informing themselves on the topic being lampooned before objecting, rather than poor satire on his part."
I can agree with that.

I don't give a crap who you were talking to. I contributed the very substantive, very relevant to you
"Around here, "identity politics" is like "cuck" or SJW or "race car bed", generally empty epithets thrown out by alt-right types bereft of substantive responses."
It's the current internet thing. "Sexist, misogynist,racist, transphobe, Islamophobe" are all thrown around like confetti, regardless of what the topic actually is to shut down the opponant.
Or when they actually engage in it. Your self-described being "overdramatic and nasty" and a "bombastic prick" and moaning about "Oppression League"s and "identity politics", and untrve advocating the segregation of nations by race.

Is it now? Thats nice.
But I was talking to Cine and since you have nothing substantive to contribute, I'll simply say
Buh Bye!

Gushed tendentious misapplication is also a thing, despite your crushing stupidity.
Around here, "identity politics" is like "cuck" or SJW or "race car bed", generally empty epithets thrown out by alt-right types bereft of substantive responses.
It's the current internet thing. "Sexist, misogynist,racist, transphobe, Islamophobe" are all thrown around like confetti, regardless of what the topic actually is to shut down the opponant.
Or when they actually engage in it. Your self-described being "overdramatic and nasty" and a "bombastic prick" and moaning about "Oppression League"s and "identity politics", and untrve advocating the segregation of nations by race.

Collectivism is also a thing, again, your ignorance is not my problem.