<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I loved the first two series of &quot;The Inbetweeners&quot; but found the third one a terrible disappointment that relied too muc]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Inbetweeners Movie</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>loz-1</strong> — <em>13 years ago(November 10, 2012 12:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I loved the first two series of "The Inbetweeners" but found the third one a terrible disappointment that relied too much on visual gags about bodily functions. At least the film focused back on basic humanity, though admittedly there were still several of those gags still in evidence, and as a whole I really enjoyed the film.<br />
I would have certainly cut a few bits out though - did we really need, for example,  to see the stripper guy's cock dangling in front of us? I think not. I think we'd already got the general idea of the joke by that point already<br />
I've been a fool but you know I wouldn't kill for you</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254707/i-loved-the-first-two-series-of-the-inbetweeners-but-found-the-third-one-a-terrible-disappointment-that-relied-too-muc</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 16:07:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254707.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:57:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I loved the first two series of &quot;The Inbetweeners&quot; but found the third one a terrible disappointment that relied too muc on Wed, 06 May 2026 18:57:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>roman2886</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 04, 2017 07:25 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The sequel to this killed a series 4 but the sequel was good in some ways Australia is not that bad.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2161097</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2161097</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:57:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I loved the first two series of &quot;The Inbetweeners&quot; but found the third one a terrible disappointment that relied too muc on Wed, 06 May 2026 18:57:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Howlin Wolf</strong> — <em>13 years ago(November 14, 2012 02:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The whole humour of the show (and movie) is based on awkwardness, though and the camera dwelling on the guy's package was certainly awkward, because it showed things from the lads perspective - like, they couldn't ignore it<br />
"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear?  How do you sit?!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2161096</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2161096</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:57:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>