<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This movie was dum!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Substance</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Booger!</strong> — <em>4 months ago(November 28, 2025 05:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I fail to see the point. Liz didn't liv vicariously thru Sue's consciousness…they didn't share memories nor did liz experience any of the success or pleasure bestowed upon sue…she just had to lay comatose for a week (often longer) and then sit around doing **** all for a week while sue 'rested"<br />
How is this arrangement any better than just having a bratty daughter sponging off you?<br />
Or just selecting an anonymous person to pretend they are you? I see no difference in this arrangement besides turning into a seahag lol. This relationship needed to be transactional to be compelling imo.<br />
Maybe I missed something but I don't see the point</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254888/this-movie-was-dum</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 07:09:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254888.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This movie was dum! on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MiniMasterpieceTheater</strong> — <em>4 months ago(November 28, 2025 06:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">good parody screen name!<br />
Cold comfort for change? Did you exchange<br />
A walk-on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2162861</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2162861</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This movie was dum! on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Rotten Apple Shampoo</strong> — <em>4 months ago(November 28, 2025 06:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know but white people rule!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2162860</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2162860</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This movie was dum! on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Booger!</strong> — <em>4 months ago(November 28, 2025 06:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The ending was as stoopid as anything I've ever seen…but the premise was beyond weak.<br />
It's like they grenlit a half baked idea. Could have been more engaging if there was a shared consciousness or the like. It's almost like a poorly conceived evil roommate flick</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2162859</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2162859</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This movie was dum! on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chicxulub</strong> — <em>4 months ago(November 28, 2025 06:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah.  It had some decent tension going for it, but then just went full on stupid at the end.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2162858</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2162858</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 19:37:39 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>