<![CDATA[68% on rotton tomatoes and a 7.5 on IMDB]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Avatar: Fire and Ash

exithereplease — 3 months ago(December 22, 2025 03:28 PM)

And we all know that 7.5 is going down as those numbers are always inflated drastically at first.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254953/68-on-rotton-tomatoes-and-a-7-5-on-imdbRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 22:06:11 GMTWed, 06 May 2026 19:47:27 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 68% on rotton tomatoes and a 7.5 on IMDB on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:47:30 GMT]]>exithereplease — 3 months ago(December 22, 2025 05:02 PM)

Fair enough point.
Thank you taking the time to comment huwdj 🙂

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163306https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163306Wed, 06 May 2026 19:47:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 68% on rotton tomatoes and a 7.5 on IMDB on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:47:29 GMT]]>huwdj — 3 months ago(December 22, 2025 05:00 PM)

Normally that would be a valid point. Initial scores are often screwed by over exuberant fans or, more commonly, idiotic haters piling in with zero ratings for films they are never going to see.
But the interesting thing about the current scoring profile for Avatar 3 is that it's very similar to Avatar 2, which has maintained it's 7.5 rating after 3 years.
I have always depended on the kindness of Strangers - and the bastards let me down!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163305https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163305Wed, 06 May 2026 19:47:29 GMT