<![CDATA[I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Avatar: Fire and Ash

MistaWeek — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:06 PM)

I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years out until the first sequel was 13 years later..yeah that pretty much killed it for me. I haven't even watched the second one at all not a shred of interest.
VLAD LOVES UNDERAGE BOYS JUST LIKE HIS DADDY USED TO.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254966/i-thought-the-first-one-2009-was-ing-amazing-and-was-hyped-for-a-sequel-but-the-constant-delays-pushing-it-years-oRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 14:08:35 GMTWed, 06 May 2026 19:49:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:46 GMT]]>AnthonySoxxx — 4 months ago(December 02, 2025 09:32 PM)

No one. That's why the sequel only made a little over 2 billion dollars at the box office.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163407https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163407Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:45 GMT]]>Tits Malone, PI — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:45 PM)

No, not even before the first one.
Donna/LadyGigi Savige needs to sit her ass down!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163406https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163406Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:43 GMT]]>Chicxulub — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:19 PM)

I didn't give a **** about the first one as a movie. The 3D effects were impressive, though (at the time). I would've watched a timely sequel, but not now.
Every 3D experience I had after that was pointless at best and headache inducingly awful at worst.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163405https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163405Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:42 GMT]]>NZer — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:14 PM)

I watched the second one and don't remember a thing about it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163404https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163404Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:41 GMT]]>(SNoW) — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:12 PM)

Second one was objectively better than the first.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163403https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163403Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o on Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:39 GMT]]>huwdj — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:10 PM)

I loved the first, was quite disappointed by the second - but I will be turning up for the 3rd - preferably with an empty bladder, a large coffee and some treats.
I have always depended on the kindness of Strangers - and the bastards let me down!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163402https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2163402Wed, 06 May 2026 19:49:39 GMT