<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Poorly done]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Zero Dark Thirty</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Adam60z</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 10, 2021 11:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I mean this would potentially be an historically significant film.  But there are way too many cons and very few pros.  We see the background where they torture prisoners.  Then that…face it…retarded CIA agent who let the terrorist into the compound while she "takes responsibility".<br />
We spend the whole film waiting for the operation to proceed and the lead believe it or not holds up numbers to show how many days they…and we the viewers have been waiting.<br />
Finally it proceeds…all in the dark.<br />
Ending…we see her crying.  Roll credits. What a freakin' waste!<br />
Mean people suck.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254990/poorly-done</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:13:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/254990.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 19:55:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>