<![CDATA[Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Black Mirror

☝ — 2 years ago(June 16, 2023 11:54 PM)

Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so.
Don't we all click that t and c's box without thinking?
So much to enjoy with this episode.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/256991/could-this-be-a-return-to-form-for-brooker-i-think-soRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:19:43 GMTThu, 07 May 2026 02:59:10 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:27 GMT]]>☝ — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:33 AM)

What can I say, it kept me engaged, I found it funny.
Sorry you didn't enjoy

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2182002https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2182002Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:25 GMT]]>𝕤 𝕚 𝕩𝕩𝕩 𝕤 𝕜 𝕚 𝕟 𝕤 — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:29 AM)

ehh
annie murphy is hot and some of that episode was enjoyable but i also found myself on my phone a few times and had to rewind
that never happened to me in season 3&4
i don’t really have high hopes for the rest of the season tbh

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2182001https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2182001Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:24 GMT]]>Phaenon — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:29 AM)

Already done and thanks!
Can go and have a puff now
Ding Dong
!
🤡🌎

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2182000https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2182000Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:23 GMT]]>☝ — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:28 AM)

The century is waiting for you in the Good Morning Brits thread.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181999https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181999Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:22 GMT]]>Phaenon — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:26 AM)

^Knows
Ding Dong
!
🤡🌎

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181998https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181998Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:20 GMT]]>☝ — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:25 AM)

I think there was once a blog explaining it all, if only he_cant were here to remind me of the
link.
Dude

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181997https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181997Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:19 GMT]]>Phaenon — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:21 AM)

Still waiting for those answers…
Maybe one day Dazed, maybe one day it will become that infamous masterpiece with a cult following that the fans of the film were certain it would be - you know, without ever offering anything to substanciate that opinion
Maybe not
Ding Dong
!
🤡🌎

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181996https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181996Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:18 GMT]]>☝ — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:18 AM)

Blanchett?
Agreed, was a tad disappointed she wasn't really in it.
You still didn't get Prometheus? After all this time 😋

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181995https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181995Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:17 GMT]]>Phaenon — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:11 AM)

Top level Harry is the real source, you'll never get to destroy him
Enjoy your fellow Prometheus fans in your fictional reality
To be fair though, the episoe could have done with a touch more Blankett
Ding Dong
!
🤡🌎

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181994https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181994Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:15 GMT]]>☝ — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:08 AM)

Prometheus really was a great film right?
By what name do I know you?
Just testing to see if you're the real Juan?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181993https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181993Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:14 GMT]]>Phaenon — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:04 AM)

I'm just doing that slightly altered
QUAM
PUTA
thing to make the retelling a little sassier
Ding Dong
!
🤡🌎

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181992https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181992Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:13 GMT]]>☝ — 2 years ago(June 17, 2023 12:01 AM)

Why are you invoking the Dimmock and her bralessness?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181991https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181991Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could this be a return to form for Brooker? I think so. on Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:11 GMT]]>Phaenon — 2 years ago(June 16, 2023 11:58 PM)

Could this be a return to form for Charlie Dimmock ? I think so.
Doesn't everyone click the T&Cs box without reading all the way through?
So much to enjoy with this garden.
Ding Dong
!
🤡🌎

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181990https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2181990Thu, 07 May 2026 02:59:11 GMT