<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Avengers: Doomsday</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Nathanred</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 12, 2024 10:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">According to an industry insider there just wasn't enough interest in the character.<br />
<a href="https://fictionhorizon.com/the-reasons-behind-marvels-decision-to-drop-kang-instead-of-recasting/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://fictionhorizon.com/the-reasons-behind-marvels-decision-to-drop-kang-instead-of-recasting/</a><br />
Majors’ legal troubles weren’t the sole reason for the studio’s decision to abandon the character. Public perception also played a significant role, as Kang was seen as an uninteresting and poorly executed villain.<br />
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania underperformed at the box office and received largely negative reviews. Many fans were disappointed that Kang was defeated solely by Ant-Man in the film.<br />
Confidence in Kang’s ability to generate the same excitement as Thanos was virtually nonexistent. Even before Majors’ verdict, the studio was reportedly reconsidering the introduction of a different villain to take Kang’s place. This was recently confirmed by Daniel Richtman, a well-known industry insider.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/257390/according-to-an-industry-insider-there-just-wasn-t-enough-interest-in-the-character</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 19:43:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/257390.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 01:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Embarrassing meltdown over lack of reading comprehension.<br />
Do I need to put you on my blocklist with the other useless *******?<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185241</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185241</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>The&lt;&gt;Mechanic</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 01:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Sophie, pls.<br />
Ho Ho Ho</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185240</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185240</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 01:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Fugazi pls<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185239</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185239</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185238</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185238</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 01:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">He should grow up and post pix of the castle he made out of potatoes and beans bc a girl on the internet did it.<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185237</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185237</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185236</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185236</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 12:52 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Embarrassing response.<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185235</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185235</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185234</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185234</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 12:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Reading comprehension.<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185233</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185233</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185232</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185232</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 13, 2024 12:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why wouldn't Antman beat his ass though? Traditionally, kang is the Avengers whipping boy. He literally never wins.<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185231</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185231</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 12, 2024 11:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not having Ant-Man beat his ass in his first major appearance probably would have helped.<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185230</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185230</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to According to an industry insider there just wasn&#x27;t enough interest in the character. on Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DojoDanny</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 12, 2024 11:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">tbf, Kang in the comics is also extremely boring, despite being considered by many as the Avengers greatest foe.<br />
I honestly don't know what they could do to make Kang interesting. Neither do they, apparently.<br />
Flawless victory. Another one for the good guys.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185229</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2185229</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:12:02 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>