<![CDATA[This film is awful.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Strangerland

caslingary — 10 years ago(July 10, 2015 03:40 PM)

This film is awful.
The Headline of the review:
raw, compelling, honest and masterful, brilliantly acted, amazing direction.
25 January 2015 | by chickamazon (Australia) See all my reviews
She gives it ten out of ten. She is from Australia. She hasn't posted any other review.
Because of that one review, I will never ever watch this film because I already know it's beep I wonder how chickamazon is related to the film?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/257712/this-film-is-awfulRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 13:44:09 GMTThu, 07 May 2026 05:08:48 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:09:04 GMT]]>rpressley — 10 years ago(August 22, 2015 03:30 AM)

Why we gotta bring the tittiez into it??

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187789https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187789Thu, 07 May 2026 05:09:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:09:03 GMT]]>Blonde2291 — 10 years ago(July 11, 2015 11:40 AM)

This movie is watchable because of Nicole Kidman's performance alone. But yes, IMDB is infested with bogus reviews and ratings done by the people closely related to movies. I have seen really bad movies rated very high on IMDB.
I only ask to be free. The butterflies are free. - Charles Dickens

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187788https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187788Thu, 07 May 2026 05:09:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:09:01 GMT]]>thory-1 — 10 years ago(December 08, 2015 04:33 PM)

Why would you assume I'm butt hurt? Is that part of being a total moron? Just assuming a whole ton of stuff?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187787https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187787Thu, 07 May 2026 05:09:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:09:00 GMT]]>caslingary — 10 years ago(July 29, 2015 01:48 AM)

You waited 2 weeks and that's the best you can do?
You really are butt hurt aren't you.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187786https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187786Thu, 07 May 2026 05:09:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:58 GMT]]>thory-1 — 10 years ago(July 28, 2015 07:14 PM)

Alas, in your experience I'm sure making an assumption always makes an ass of yourself.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187785https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187785Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:57 GMT]]>thory-1 — 10 years ago(July 28, 2015 07:13 PM)

Try removing your thumb from your ass.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187784https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187784Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:56 GMT]]>at7000 — 10 years ago(July 15, 2015 10:54 PM)

Is calling someone a t_t part of the Australian lexicon of insults and profanities? Fascinating.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187783https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187783Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:55 GMT]]>caslingary — 10 years ago(July 13, 2015 06:08 PM)

Let us be clear - yes you are a tit!
I've made an assumption based on experience - it's what everyone does, including halfwits like you.
You are just bum hurt because you thought you'd come on here acting the big shot, but alas, you ended up making a fool of yourself. Please desist unless you have something to contribute other than stupidity.
And yes, I do have some amazing theories which I share all over the place - and they are gratefully received.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187782https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187782Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:53 GMT]]>thory-1 — 10 years ago(July 13, 2015 04:21 PM)

Oh yea, really thoughtful - you make an assumption and then try to spin it as truth and I'm the tit? I bet you have some other amazing theories to share with the world.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187781https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187781Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:52 GMT]]>caslingary — 10 years ago(July 11, 2015 05:19 AM)

It is not an idiotic assessment - it is a thoughtful decision taken through experience. So stop acting like a tit.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187780https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187780Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:51 GMT]]>thory-1 — 10 years ago(July 11, 2015 04:16 AM)

What an idiotic assessment. You're calling a movie awful that you haven't seen just because of 1 review that may or may not have been legitimate?
While it won't be winning any Oscar's it was far from awful.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187779https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187779Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This film is awful. on Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:50 GMT]]>EldritchTsathoggua — 10 years ago(July 10, 2015 07:00 PM)

She was the on-set fluffer.
Touch darkness and darkness touches you back.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187778https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2187778Thu, 07 May 2026 05:08:50 GMT