<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Zero sum gain]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Arrival</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>stefano-6</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 14, 2017 10:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Did she say it was a zero-sum-gain? Which is not Win-win.<br />
Or did she say Non-zero-sum-gain and I just just missed it? This is the win-win option.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258086/zero-sum-gain</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 12:12:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258086.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 06:32:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Zero sum gain on Thu, 07 May 2026 06:32:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HenryCW</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 14, 2017 12:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">They were talking about a non-zero-sum<br />
game<br />
, which is in contrast to a zero-sum game. In a zero-sum game, the gains of the participants sum to zero, so I could gain only at someone else's expense. The film implied that the nations providing information on the screens could all gain by cooperating (instead of blanking the screens out) which is a "win-win" situation.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2191466</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2191466</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 06:32:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>