<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[3 things hurt the movie (NO SPOILERS)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Arrival</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>kurtrivero</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 11, 2016 09:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">1.) It is overlong for what is, in the end, a remarkably simplistic story. The film is based on a short story and it feels it. Could have easily lost a good 10 to 15 minutes. Or made a 50 minute Twilight Zone or Outer Limits episode and been just as good, covering all the same material.<br />
2.) The musical score is overwrought and overused at times. Those final 10 minutes during the so-called "shocking ending" where those piano keys and strings are pounded onto the soundtrack, basically drilling into the audience that THIS IS IMPORTANT AND MINDBLOWING!!!!!!!!!!  Overbearing and completely unnecessary.<br />
3.) Zero chemistry between Adams and Renner. Just didn't buy that whole thing by the end. Renner's Ian hardly registers as a character and more a one-dimensional plot device.<br />
Otherwise I liked the movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258243/3-things-hurt-the-movie-no-spoilers</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:17:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258243.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 06:59:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>