<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Like they spent 30 minutes revealing the &quot;twist&quot; of who the baby was and who the father&#x2F;husband was as if we didn&#x27;t imme]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Arrival</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>icebladexi</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 11, 2016 12:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Like they spent 30 minutes revealing the "twist" of who the baby was and who the father/husband was as if we didn't immediately know within half a second.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258283/like-they-spent-30-minutes-revealing-the-twist-of-who-the-baby-was-and-who-the-father-husband-was-as-if-we-didn-t-imme</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 23:10:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258283.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:03:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Like they spent 30 minutes revealing the &quot;twist&quot; of who the baby was and who the father&#x2F;husband was as if we didn&#x27;t imme on Thu, 07 May 2026 07:03:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jackalfarrell</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 11, 2016 03:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I did think that too. It becomes obvious he's the father the second you realise the visions are of the future, not the past, so it was a bit odd that a few of the later visions still treated it as a mystery who the father was. Not really a big deal though.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2192819</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2192819</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:03:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Like they spent 30 minutes revealing the &quot;twist&quot; of who the baby was and who the father&#x2F;husband was as if we didn&#x27;t imme on Thu, 07 May 2026 07:03:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DavidTL</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 11, 2016 12:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Spent 30 minutes?! Lol.<br />
Would you rather the film have been like DING DING DING "he is him" - THE END - CREDITS<br />
Yes, I knew too at the reveal and as I started to realise what we saw wasn't the past, but future. But that did not lesson the impact at all</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2192818</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2192818</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:03:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Like they spent 30 minutes revealing the &quot;twist&quot; of who the baby was and who the father&#x2F;husband was as if we didn&#x27;t imme on Thu, 07 May 2026 07:03:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>foebane72</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 11, 2016 02:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, I didn't know. I prefer not to jump to conclusions with a movie.<br />
Why are you here if you haven't seen the movie yet?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2192817</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2192817</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:03:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>