<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Finally saw it…wasn&#x27;t so bad, except for the villain]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Star Trek Beyond</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Mogz</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 08:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Everything else, even the silly tacked on dirtbike, was forgivable, and some of it was actually good and interesting.<br />
But the villain was justbad.   I mean, apparently early starfleet gave a huge command assignment to a soldier suffering from hellish PSTD and other mental issues.   Who happened to crash land on a planet with technology randomly better than ANYTHING the federation has found on thousands of planets they explore.<br />
Who carries a completely unreasonable, unjustifiable grudge hundreds of years for being stranded on a planetOH WAIT he had a spaceship, no a -fleet- of spaceships that they apparently found and could have left with at any goddamn time?    Yes, they needed that little puzzle piece to activate the superweapon portion, but they were hardly "stranded"the superweapon wouldn't have even been necessary if they'd simply not randomly been weak to bad music.   Moreover he obviously figured out how to not only communicate for a rescue, but tap into secret starship journals and other data sources from light years away.<br />
So, the alien tech apparently made him super strong, super resilient, basically immortaland dumb as a box of rocks?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258581/finally-saw-it-wasn-t-so-bad-except-for-the-villain</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 14:55:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258581.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finally saw it…wasn&#x27;t so bad, except for the villain on Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Yorick-6</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 06, 2017 06:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, agree with everything you wrote. It's a shame, the idea behind a Federation officer that's gone full Colonel Kurtz could have been really cool, but they ended up making it idiotic.<br />
Also, what would he have done if the "superweapon" (seemed like you could have gotten the same effect with a bunch of poison gas, but whatever) didn't happen to float by them? Just stay on the planet for another 500 years hoping that it'd eventually pop up?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2195338</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2195338</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finally saw it…wasn&#x27;t so bad, except for the villain on Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>be236</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 06, 2017 01:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agreed.. the premise for this movie was weak</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2195337</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2195337</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finally saw it…wasn&#x27;t so bad, except for the villain on Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>howard_w13</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 19, 2016 01:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">+2<br />
I thought the Khan-rehash in STID was the worst till I saw this film.<br />
The movie has a plot hole?!?<br />
EVERY FRIGGIN' MOVIE HAS A FRIGGIN' PLOT HOLE!!!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2195336</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2195336</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>