<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why are they stuck on that?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Star Trek Beyond</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>collint-46427</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 22, 2016 01:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why are they stuck on that?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258584/why-are-they-stuck-on-that</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 23:27:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258584.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why are they stuck on that? on Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>be236</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 06, 2017 01:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, seems a lot of movies are going this same-old plot-route geez these movie makers really need new ideas/stories</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2195346</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2195346</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:59:57 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>