<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Search Party certainly isn&#x27;t terrible, but with a cast this likable and talented it should&#x27;ve been a lot better:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Search Party</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>DarlesChickens</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 13, 2016 05:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Search Party certainly isn't terrible, but with a cast this likable and talented it should've been a lot better:<br />
<a href="http://www.cutprintfilm.com/reviews/search-party/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cutprintfilm.com/reviews/search-party/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258876/search-party-certainly-isn-t-terrible-but-with-a-cast-this-likable-and-talented-it-should-ve-been-a-lot-better</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 04:23:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/258876.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 08:44:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>