<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Yes, she may be old but she still looked good..]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Nightcrawler</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Verdugo85</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 20, 2017 07:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, she may be old but she still looked good..</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/259115/yes-she-may-be-old-but-she-still-looked-good</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:35:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/259115.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 09:19:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Yes, she may be old but she still looked good.. on Thu, 07 May 2026 09:19:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WhaChaChaKing</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 04, 2017 10:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Eh not to me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2198777</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2198777</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 09:19:28 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>