<![CDATA[Did everyone forgot about the title?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 99 Homes

davidlandry96 — 10 years ago(March 04, 2016 07:41 PM)

Through the en of the film, we know the deal is for a hundred houses. The title strongly suggests the main character saved the final scene family home! I think the title is very interesting, because it clearly says Garfield character saved that home, but that everything goes on after which is cheerful and depressing at the same time, any thoughts on that? Great film!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/259262/did-everyone-forgot-about-the-titleRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:57:42 GMTThu, 07 May 2026 09:51:48 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Did everyone forgot about the title? on Thu, 07 May 2026 09:51:52 GMT]]>Marla_the_big_tourist — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 11:54 AM)

It pinged on a quote from Carver too, I thought.
Only one in a hundred's gonna get on that ark, son. Every other poor soul's gonna drown.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2200177https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2200177Thu, 07 May 2026 09:51:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Did everyone forgot about the title? on Thu, 07 May 2026 09:51:51 GMT]]>callum9999 — 10 years ago(March 06, 2016 04:16 PM)

Though surely if he saved the last home, that therefore means the entire deal falls through (even if they somehow get away with the perjury/fraud racket) so there are 0 houses?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2200176https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2200176Thu, 07 May 2026 09:51:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Did everyone forgot about the title? on Thu, 07 May 2026 09:51:50 GMT]]>moviefool09 — 10 years ago(March 05, 2016 09:41 AM)

I agree with your theorygood catch.
"The future is tape, videotape, and NOT film?"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2200175https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2200175Thu, 07 May 2026 09:51:50 GMT