<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Does reporting posts promoting illegal downloads actually work?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — I Need To Know</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Good-Will</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 23, 2016 02:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've done this at least 5 times in the past month, but the posts are still there.<br />
Should I bother any more or does Amazon not care about piracy?<br />
It seems strange to me that a producer of TV series as good as "The Man In The High Castle" doesn't really seem to be bothered about removing them at all.<br />
These two posters are on a lot of boards:<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/user/ur67602366/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/user/ur67602366/</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/user/ur70170953/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/user/ur70170953/</a><br />
All they do is post links to illegal download sites, so should I give up reporting their posts or carry on?<br />
If the opposite of Love is indifference, what's the opposite of Hate?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/2594/does-reporting-posts-promoting-illegal-downloads-actually-work</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 09:21:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/2594.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:11:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does reporting posts promoting illegal downloads actually work? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:11:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Snaggelpuss</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 30, 2016 07:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">They just keep making new accounts, unless they are going to IP track the problem will continue. Most of these links are for hacking purposes anyway!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/16779</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/16779</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:11:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does reporting posts promoting illegal downloads actually work? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:11:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>horn-5</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 23, 2016 11:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">and one of the spamming-persisters has made a comeback today.<br />
Les</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/16778</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/16778</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:11:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does reporting posts promoting illegal downloads actually work? on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:11:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>LucusNon</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 23, 2016 11:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've reported<br />
Colexy21<br />
and various other spam accounts dozens of times.<br />
.<br />
Some spam accounts have been removed, but obviously a number of them persist, and of course new spam accounts have continued to appear.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/16777</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/16777</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:11:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>