Definitely up there.

Honestly, The Phantom Menace wasn't half as bad. Not good by any means but at least it TRIED to be entertaining and not just set up future garbage.

Yes, by far.
It's the comic-book equivalent of The Phantom Menace for Star Wars, the only difference is that people back then still had faith in George Lucas and respected him (more or less) while no one has faith or respect for Snyder.

As disappointing as this is, this is 10x better than the Fantastic Four reboot.
That movie is BRU-TAL!!!
When we're thinking about our own brain, would that be a mental paradox??

My gosh,this movie is not entertaining despite the guaranteed star power and the automatic built in audience. I've seen low budget movies that come on at 2am much better than this piece of crap. I don't know how the producers didn't make the directors re=edit or re shoot this poorly made movie. I had it recorded on DVR, but am deleting it.

Yes, they are full of pathetic excuses.
FROM:"Save me Batman, please, save me" WB and MOS TO:"Save me Product Placement, save me" WB and BvS

Which is a shame considering that TFA is a glorified rehash/remake disguised as a sequel.
You could argue that's it's a well made remake, but one of the key factors to the declining quality of movies nowadays is a severe lack of originality and if half of films that had what is considered to be the best sequels ever followed TFA's example, we'd never have The Empire Strikes Back or Godfather II.
How does it feel to be deconstructed?

It is the most disappointing CBM ever for sure no contest on that one at all. The key word here is disappointing though I am not listing it as the worse but this film was something that fans had waited decades to see and the film had such potential not to mention that it is the biggest title that DC could possibly bring to its cinematic universe, other worse CBM than this I don't feel had anywhere near the potential this film had
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock

Yes, say it even if you have to spray it.

And before some beep uses the "but the hype was top big" excuse
Look at TFA
Higher than average imdb rating
Critics loved it
Amazon reviews are awesome
So dawn of justice has no excuse

Doesn't your own logic show how it couldn't be as disappointing? If the last attempt was terrible, then people wouldn't have high expectations that could be let down.
Batman was the most bankable name in the comic book industry before this film, and while it wasn't beloved, MoS was far more successful commercially and critically than FF.
I'd say, based on all the goodwill and resources, BvS had higher expectations than any other film in the last decade outside of Star Wars.

Josh Trank's Fantastic Four is probably more disappointing.. people actually thought that Fox would get it right after messing it up the last time.
IMDB taught me: cynicism is praised. optimism must be stamped out wherever it can be found.

Absolutely! Some might think MOS is more disapointing, however, at the end, everything that was wrong with MOS could have been fixed in the next movie, but they sink it even deeper with this turd called BvS. In other words, MOS had ways to fix it (even if they didn't manage it), but BvS is without hope.
FROM:"Save me Batman, please, save me" WB and MOS TO:"Save me Product Placement, save me" WB and BvS

Yup. TDKR was disappointing but that's just one character.
This is the Trinity. It's the biggest CBM ever and the biggest bust.

Undeniably it is.
Batman's last 2 films grossed over a billion dollars each.
Superman and Batman are the two longest running, and most iconic characters in comic book history. Globally recognizable.
This was the first pairing of these characters on screen.
It was to launch the DCEU, giving fans another first - the Justice League live action.
It had three years of production, and is one of the most expensive films ever made.
That it could have everything in it's favour and come out, at best, as divisive is why it's the most disappointing. Not because it's the worst, or it veered the furthest from source material, but because it had everything in its favour and couldn't deliver.

Not great, but I don't know how disappointed I was with it. I didn't have high hopes after MAN OF STEEL anyway. When MAN OF STEEL 2 suddenly because BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE I already figured they were panicking.
I would probably go with IRON MAN 3, even though I still like it. I don't like their depiction of the Mandarin (and yes I'm familiar with ALL HAIL THE KING, but fat chance of following that up anytime soon). It clearly wasn't what the first movie was building to. And in a post-AVENGERS world there's no sign of any of the other heroes. I understand they want to keep the focus on Tony for his final solo, but come on. The world thinks Tony was killed, and no one at SHIELD investigates? The US President is kidnapped and being threatened by a terrorist, and yet no Captain America? The MCU is in real time, so it's not like this is happening at the exact same time as CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

Wait, yes to disappointing or best?

The answer has to be a resounding HELL YES.

No, it's one of the besg (imo).
one of the besg
besg
lol, it is besg
i feed the trolls and have them tap dancing for my amusement

No, it's one of the besg (imo).

That should tick everyone off.

Batman V Superman is still the worst movie that I saw all year and that includes Independence Day Regurgitation.
For sure.

Batman V Superman is still the worst movie that I saw all year and that includes Independence Day Regurgitation.
So yes, how can any true comic book fan not be let down by this thing? As bad as other movies have been was anyone expecting greatness from Elektra after DD? Punisher War Zone after The Punisher? Fantastic Four in any incarnation? Batman after Burton left?

This message has been deleted.