<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It is the exact same performance.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>dexx-26415</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 10, 2017 10:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is the exact same performance.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/259636/it-is-the-exact-same-performance</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:53:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/259636.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It is the exact same performance. on Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tjlamb0518</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 10, 2017 12:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Because, despite what the 1% wants to think, the founder of Facebook is not a power-mad super-villain? So the performances should NOT be the same?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203544</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203544</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It is the exact same performance. on Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tjlamb0518</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 10, 2017 01:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">How much wood can a woodcuck cuck if a woodcuck could cuck wood?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203543</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203543</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It is the exact same performance. on Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>deadpixel128</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 10, 2017 01:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Depends. What's the password?<br />
If you can't defend a movie without bashing another, you will be put on ignore. No exceptions.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203542</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203542</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It is the exact same performance. on Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dexx-26415</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 10, 2017 01:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Must be a cuck?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203541</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203541</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It is the exact same performance. on Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>deadpixel128</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 10, 2017 11:32 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Anyone who uses "cuck" isn't to be taken seriously. Either they're using it ironically, in which case they're just joking, or they're using it unironically, in which case they're just an a$$hole who you shouldn't concern yourself with.<br />
If you can't defend a movie without bashing another, you will be put on ignore. No exceptions.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203540</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203540</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It is the exact same performance. on Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>deadpixel128</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 10, 2017 11:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Anyone who uses "cuck" isn't to be taken seriously. Either they're using it ironically, in which case they're just joking, or they're using it unironically, in which case they're just an a$$hole who you shouldn't concern yourself with.<br />
If you can't defend a movie without bashing another, you will be put on ignore. No exceptions.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203539</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203539</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It is the exact same performance. on Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Kmadden2004</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 10, 2017 11:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is this a serious question?<br />
If you feel like Picard screaming how many lights there are, it's time to walk away from the thread.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203538</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2203538</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:09:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>