Fair enough. Care to elaborate?

I do.

1. I didn't want to get into discussing the "storytelling" of the fights because I felt that was something that could be very subjective. Which is why I was only focusing on the fight choreography, which I felt was objectively and unquestionably more complex for Civil War than it was for BvS.
2. Same with #1, I didn't want to discuss which one felt more emotional or more gratifying. Simply that the fight in CW had more closure since their fight actually finished. With Cap winning and walking away. In BvS, they fight was stopped before it was concluded. One could say that Batman had just about won, but that "Martha" moment will go down as probably one of the most controversial scenes in a fight ever.
3. Ok I'll revise. WW does have a reason to be in the movie. But did she have a reason to be in the fight?

1. The choreography is definitely more complex in Civil War but I'm talking about the storytelling in the battles, and in that regard, BVS was better done.
2. ~
3. They kind of level out for me. As sad as it was to see Tony broken and alone, it also saddened me to see Bruce break down from his mother's loss and come to the realization that he has become the very thing he set out to stop.
4. Oh, I hated the CCTV cameos. I was severely disappointed with them. They could have included Aquaman in the final battle and Victor could have been shown, as a civilian, helping people in the final battle but then getting injured, which would have tied it in to his inclusion in the universe. But no, we got the CCTV mess. So I agree that SM, BP and Ant Man were better included. But for me, Wonder Woman had a good reason to be in BVS. If she doesn't get her picture, then she will be exposed as a metahuman, which A: would have led to her being hunted and B: bring her out of the shadows which she has tried (presumably) for the past 80 years to prevent. That's why it worked for me.

Thank you for the respectful rebut. I don't mind level-headed debates. Anyway to answer your points:

1. I'd like to point out that it will always be more complex to choreograph fight scenes between multiple combatants especially if you try to make each fight individualized so that each participant is given enough focus to showcase their unique skills. CW and BvS did this, but CW did it with more characters who had a greater variety of skillsets. That's why I say it's more complex. You may not think it's better, but the choreography is definitely a lot more complex.
2. ~
3. I was talking only about the resolution of the fight itself, not so much the ending of the movie. I feel that CW was intentionally made to feel vague and open at the end. Also, the ending of Cap and Tony's fight was very close to the end of the movie and it was central to the theme of the movie which means it won't feel quite as closed as BvS because Batman and Superman's conflict ended with pretty much a lot of stuff still happening after it, and it wasn't the climactic fight. Which means it had more time and opportunity to close. Don't know if that makes sense.
4. Spiderman, Antman and Hawkeye's reasons for being in the movie are shallow I agree, but it's still better than the CCTV cameos we had of the rest of the JLA. BP's father was killed by Bucky supposedly and BP wants revenge on Bucky. That makes more sense in getting him involved in the whole fight as compared to WW who went looking for her picture.

Technically speaking, no one can really say anything is "objectively" better because people have different preferences.
I disagree with some of your points. I will respectfully rebut them and hopefully we can make this a peaceful discussion:

1. I really loved the airport fight. But to me, it wasn't more complex than the BVS fight. And in the airport, they severely mishandled Vision and Wanda in the airport. They didn't do much. It was like the directors didn't know what to do with them in that scene. Vision could have destroyed the jet with his omnibeam. Heck, any of Tony's side could have done it. Or Wanda could have used her powers to literally just throw all of Tony's side away or pinned them down. But they didn't.
2. Fair Enough. I agree.
3. Most people are mixed on "Martha". It isn't one sided with dislike. Martha ended the fight well for me. Tony and Steve's resolution was good as well. However, the ending of CW was more abrupt and unfinished than BVS's ending. BVS actually concluded but CW kinda rushed its ending.
4. WW had just as much as reason as BP. And Spider-Man, Ant-Man and Hawk-eye's reasoning's are extremely shallow.

Even if we take out personal taste from the equation, there are still more things we can objectively say that Civil War did better than BvS:

1. The airport battle was much more complex than any fight scene in BvS. You might not like the airport battle (most like it though) but you can't argue the fact that that fight entailed choreography for way more combatants using vastly more different powersets than anything in BvS.
2. The argument between Cap and Tony have more development to it. Their argument has built up for 3 movies now, and then you add both their disagreement on the Accords and over Bucky. So while you may or may not agree with their argument, you can't really deny that it has at least been more developed than the disagreement between Batman and Superman.
3. There was a better resolution to the fight. Even if you feel that the Martha scene is perfectly justified (most do not) it still doesn't change the fact that the ending of the fight felt too abrupt and unfinished. In comparison to Civil War, Cap and Tony actually finish their fight, with Cap ending up completely depowering Ironman and walking away able to save Bucky. Yes, there were no deaths, but then Cap's intentions were never to kill or even hurt Tony. So the fight actually ended.
4. Side characters have better reasons to be there, and cameos are better handled. Black Panther was central to the storyline of Civil War and although Spiderman's, Antman's and Hawkeye's involvement were pretty shallow, they at least had better reasons to be in the movie instead of just looking for your picture or seeing you through CCTV footage.

I don't. CW is a far better film. Zack squeezed like four comic books into one film and then didn't even understand what took place is said source.
It ended up being silly and not making much sense.

I liked it more.
Despite all those flaws that were nit-picked to the oblivion since its release I think its more epic, more artistic and it feels more organic to me
It has some really great moments
I will say I like the 1st half of Civil War much better than the 2nd
But I think MCU and DC is simply for a different audienceobviously by reactions
I like MCU. Hey I saw 13 movies now why stop?
But DC was always closer to my heart because Batman
Funny thing is I really really love X men and they are not part of MCUand I must say Im happy about that

Very few.

That's your opinion. End of story.

"This is my opinion. I am treating it as fact. End of story."
That must work well for you.

CW is the way better movie, end of story.
WB/DC blew it big time with BVS. The disappointment of that movie scarred alot of DC fans who trusted WB and Snyder for it.

Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale

I prefer BvS theatrical cut. With CW, I find a lot of scenes to be bland and while it may be Marvel's most mature movie and the action in some scenes were amazing, I also don't feel emotionally connected with the movie while I do with BvS TC.

The thing is that Bruce has been demonizing Superman as a monster.
He even acknowledged that Superman wasn't exactly evil, he wanted to murder him for a 1% chance that he might turn bad at some point.
"Martha" changes that.
There are precious few scenes in movie history that I so wish would've worked for me but so absolutely didn't work at all.
By not killing Lex, he finishes his arc that ran through the entire movie.
The arc that he started out somehow so broken that he killed people left and right, without us really ever seeing what -if anything- that meant to him? He kills hired thugs and doesn't even bat an eye (pun alarm) and he plans to murder a guy who did nothing but help people, but seeing that guy sacrifice himself somehow brings him to return to being a better person we can only guess he might've been in the past.
And to celebrate that he decides not kill or sentence to death a madman who must be one of the worst criminals he's ever met. That guy also knows all his secrets, the secrets of his deceased, living and potential future allies, and indicates that he's somehow connected to an even bigger evil that's about to come.
He was plenty happy through a lot of MOS and showed some happiness in BVS. But he doesn't lead a completely happy life.
I don't remember too much happiness before learning to fly, meeting Lois and working at the Planet.
In BvS there's the moment when he smiles because he's about to put a terrorist through multiple walls, the one when he distracts Lois from seriously discussing their relationship via super-bathtub-sex, maybe to some degree when he hallucinates about his father (whom he let die), when he talks to his mom (partially about the father he let die).
Also when he finally realizes that the planet he's been living on his whole life is "his world", instead of the one he only learned about less than two years ago, and that Lois is "his world", as if she hadn't already been the thing he cared about the most by far. Oh yeah, a minute after that last happy moment he's dead.

The thing is that Bruce has been demonizing Superman as a monster. "Martha" changes that.
Superman's death shows how much he cared for this planet, that he gave his life. And Bruce saw this first hand. Metropolis was entirely different.
By not killing Lex, he finishes his arc that ran through the entire movie.
He was plenty happy through a lot of MOS and showed some happiness in BVS. But he doesn't lead a completely happy life.

Superman's death was the thing that restored hope in humanity
I get that's how they meant all this, but it just doesn't work for me. Maybe if Superman had actually appeared to be some kind of inspirational figure to Bruce, but he was mostly just a superpowered alien bully. A bully whom Bruce wanted to murder, before he started to claim that his mother had the same name as Bruce's.
After that he saw Superman do the exact same thing he'd done 18 months prior - fight an unstoppable Kryptonian monster. Only this time Supes didn't make it out alive, so instead of spiraling down into murderous rage Bruce now finds his way back to the light?
that's what stopped his killing (evidenced from him not branding Lex in the prison).
I'm almost more pissed about him letting Luthor live at the end than I am about him nonchalantly killing the thugs. That's the one kill that would've been well advised.
This Superman does not have a happy life.
Can't say I ever reaally saw him working towards changing that. His standard reaction to anything unwelcome happening to him is to look constipated and accept it.

That's exactly why Batman is a villain in the movie. And for me, it was done well.
To your point of him killing even after Martha, my explanation of that is that while "Martha" is what snapped him out of his kill rage for Superman, Superman's death was the thing that restored hope in humanity and that's what stopped his killing (evidenced from him not branding Lex in the prison).
This Superman does not have a happy life. He's thrown into situation after situation of death and destruction. He is the most controversial figure on Earth. Every action he does has consequences. He has a psychotic billionaire who dresses like a bat after his life. And he has another psychotic billionaire after him who kidnaps his girlfriend and his mother. This is the furthest thing from a happy life.

For me with BVS, I didn't need the years of buildup. In contrast to Civil War, this wasn't a both sides are right thing. In BVS, Batman is a villain (until "Martha"). He's a villain with good motivations. And that really worked for me, showing how dark a hero could go
I don't think that you need years of build up with Batman and Superman most people have a good idea who these characters are by now. However in BvS both characters are so none relatable why would I give a damn about a grown man dresses up as a bat and murders people? Why do you call this guy a hero he is a murderer and a torturer and while he may be targeting other undesirables that does not make his actions right and just because he changes his mind that does not excuse what he has already done and then in the very next scene he is back to doing it anyway. Then we have Superman a guy who has everything going for him and has a great life but is still a depressed emo? Who here are we meant to actually side with or care about?
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock

Well said.

oh the giant hypocrite got triggered.
Calls out DC fans for being biased, but is totally biased herself
Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale

Please don't reply to Ramboman in our discussion. I don't need to see his insanity.
"Silflay hraka, u embleer rah!"

The only thing you and other rabid DC fanboys care about for the DCEU is the heroes being "dark" badass, reckless, muscle-bound and action scenes but no story. Its like you want the DCEU to repeat the same mistake as Schumacker's Batman & Robin.