<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[in our local cinemas. $844,541,675 world wide according to Box Office Mojo, against a $180–225 million budget. That&#x27;s a]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jurassic World Rebirth</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>huwdj</strong> — <em>7 months ago(August 26, 2025 06:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">in our local cinemas. $844,541,675 world wide according to Box Office Mojo, against a $180–225 million budget. That's a healthy return (lets not bother arguing about how that would be calculated) for, what I thought, was an OK but unoriginal movie.<br />
I think we can expect another Jurassic sequel in the not too distant future.<br />
I have always depended on the kindness of Strangers - and the bastards let me down!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/260209/in-our-local-cinemas-844-541-675-world-wide-according-to-box-office-mojo-against-a-180-225-million-budget-that-s-a</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 09:59:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/260209.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 13:40:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>