<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why hasn&#x27;t anyone said what a horrible idea this is?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Happy Gilmore 2</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>lukejbarnett</strong> — <em>1 year ago(January 05, 2025 06:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You can't make a sequel 20 years after the original. They almost always is a bad thing. The only time it ever worked was psycho 2.<br />
lukejbarnett</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/260426/why-hasn-t-anyone-said-what-a-horrible-idea-this-is</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 11:44:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/260426.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:38:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why hasn&#x27;t anyone said what a horrible idea this is? on Thu, 07 May 2026 14:38:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>The Movie Lady</strong> — <em>1 year ago(January 05, 2025 08:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Uh, this movie came out in 1996, so you mean 29 years.<br />
Goddamnit, man! You done made me hurt my dick hand. (Phone Booth, 2002)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212371</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212371</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:38:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>