<![CDATA[You can't make a sequel 20 years after the original. They almost always is a bad thing. The only time it ever worked was]]>

<![CDATA[You can't make a sequel 20 years after the original. They almost always is a bad thing. The only time it ever worked was]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Happy Gilmore 2

lukejbarnett — 1 year ago(January 05, 2025 06:17 PM)

You can't make a sequel 20 years after the original. They almost always is a bad thing. The only time it ever worked was psycho 2.
lukejbarnett

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/260427/you-can-t-make-a-sequel-20-years-after-the-original-they-almost-always-is-a-bad-thing-the-only-time-it-ever-worked-wasRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 18:58:23 GMTThu, 07 May 2026 14:39:00 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to You can't make a sequel 20 years after the original. They almost always is a bad thing. The only time it ever worked was on Thu, 07 May 2026 14:39:02 GMT]]>The Movie Lady — 1 year ago(January 05, 2025 08:35 PM)

Uh, this movie came out in 1996, so you mean 29 years.
Goddamnit, man! You done made me hurt my dick hand. (Phone Booth, 2002)

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212373https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212373Thu, 07 May 2026 14:39:02 GMT