<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Apparantley really good, but only if you liked 28 years]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>-<em>- wot -</em>-</strong> — <em>2 months ago(January 14, 2026 03:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If you didnt like 28 years, then Bone temple is very much more of the same.<br />
This is the vibe I am getting from the spoiler free reviews I have watched. Its been kinda hard to focus ever since someone posted Kiwis ass all over the foum, I have just been thinking about tapping that all morning.<br />
But yeah, bone temple is more of the same **** we saw in 28 years.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/260505/apparantley-really-good-but-only-if-you-liked-28-years</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 16:16:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/260505.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparantley really good, but only if you liked 28 years on Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>-<em>- wot -</em>-</strong> — <em>2 months ago(January 14, 2026 04:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">there is alot more Ninja teletuby Jimmy Saville stuff.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212652</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212652</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparantley really good, but only if you liked 28 years on Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>xx</strong> — <em>2 months ago(January 14, 2026 04:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I suspect the latter.<br />
Following azn.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212651</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparantley really good, but only if you liked 28 years on Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chicxulub</strong> — <em>2 months ago(January 14, 2026 04:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is it like 28 Years Later, or is it like<br />
the ending<br />
of 28 Years Later?  Because I thought 28 Years Later was okay until<br />
the ending<br />
.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212650</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212650</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Apparantley really good, but only if you liked 28 years on Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>xx</strong> — <em>2 months ago(January 14, 2026 03:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">They have jumped the shark with this franchise. I don't see it being a box office hit, the scratch has been itched. There's apparently another one to come after this, God help us. Well, it'll be available to watch at home in no time. I like how they just pretend the second movie never happened, because no one liked it. It's the 25th anniversary next year, they should have just gone with a cinematic re-release.<br />
Following azn.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212649</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2212649</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>