<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Tudors or Wolf Hall?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Wolf Hall</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Dungatar</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 25, 2016 08:46 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have seen The Tudors and i liked it but it is too glamour in my opinion especially Jonathan Rhys Meyers looks like a rockstar not a king as Henry VIII! Is Wolf Hall more realistic?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/261018/the-tudors-or-wolf-hall</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:16:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/261018.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Tudors or Wolf Hall? on Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>EllisFowler</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 04, 2017 05:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I also prefer<br />
WH<br />
but I came to it as a fan of the novels on which it's based. I was much less impressed with<br />
TT<br />
but I enjoyed it regardless.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2217253</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2217253</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Tudors or Wolf Hall? on Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jimmiemac-97957</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 06, 2016 06:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wolf Hall. By a mile.<br />
ps - This guide helped get me through the first episode. They jump back and forth in time and it can be easy to get lost.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/13556920/board/thread/257127331" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/13556920/board/thread/257127331</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2217252</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2217252</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Tudors or Wolf Hall? on Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>angelofvic</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 29, 2016 10:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">.<br />
Yes, I think you would like Wolf Hall. Although it is exquisitely filmed, there is no "glamour" or attempt to appeal to youthful sexuality or stuff like that. The filmmakers took the story and period very seriously. That said, it is quite enjoyable (especially once you get past episode 1, which sets the story up and is a bit slow).<br />
.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2217251</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2217251</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Tudors or Wolf Hall? on Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JaneCat</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 26, 2016 01:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes,<br />
Wolf Hall<br />
is more realistic. The events, the dialogue, the characters, the costumes, etc. are more historically accurate. Not perfect but much better in my opinion than<br />
The Tudors<br />
.<br />
Wolf<br />
is slower paced, there is more dialogue, and no one looks like a rock star.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2217250</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2217250</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:40:06 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>