<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[A.D. vs A.D. The Bible Continues]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — A.D. The Bible Continues</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>nottesigana18</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 25, 2015 02:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Which is more accurate? A.D.(1985) or A.D. The Bible Continues (2015)?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/262369/a-d-vs-a-d-the-bible-continues</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 01:29:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/262369.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 20:41:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A.D. vs A.D. The Bible Continues on Thu, 07 May 2026 20:41:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mlauzon</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 05, 2016 02:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Neither, because the "bible" is just a book of fairy tales, taken from other fairy tales!<br />
If you want 'more accurate', then look to science, not some fairy tale about a magical sky fairy that doesn't exist!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2227333</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2227333</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 20:41:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>