<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[What do you think *SPOILER ALERT*]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Nocturnal Animals</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>The_Boxing_Cat</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 12, 2017 12:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Edward's novel is NOT about his life, but rather it's about SUSAN'S CURRENT LIFE and how she and her (current) daughter- the one she calls whilst reading his manuscript.<br />
Maybe: Tony Hastings is actually Hutton, not Edward, and of course Laura is Susan and India is the daughter she telephoned.<br />
At first I thought it represented the abortion and Edward and Susan's life together. But after much thought, I think it's pure REVENGE by Edward.<br />
Thoughts???</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/262989/what-do-you-think-spoiler-alert</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 21:30:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/262989.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:27:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What do you think *SPOILER ALERT* on Thu, 07 May 2026 22:27:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MasterlessSamurai</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 12, 2017 08:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've been reading all kinds of fantastical theories, but really the movie is not that deep. That all the characters except Tony/Edward were manifestations of Susuan's persona, that he had cancer, committed suicide, so on and so on.<br />
What I gathered from the film was that Susan now at a low point in her life, in a loveless marriage where she is being cheated on by her husband, Hutton ( good luck getting a man that good looking to be faithful ) her work is passionless and mundane, she is surrounded by the fake, the processed, sleep deprived, utterly miserable, and isolated.<br />
The novel served as a simple "look I did it, proved you wrong" showing to her that he could write a novel, however he attained the necessary particulars through extreme pain and loss. One of the themes of the film was that Susan was not truly a creative, she knew this later in her life.<br />
Edward's novel, and standing her up at the restaurant did two things.</p>
<ol>
<li>Left her, and compounded the reality, alone and broken, just as she had left him.</li>
<li>Will now brand her with so much hurt, it will give life to her art.</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2231748</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2231748</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:27:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>