<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Is there any CGI in this? Is it shot on film or digital?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Nocturnal Animals</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>TurboSquirt</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 09, 2017 11:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Anyone know?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/263025/is-there-any-cgi-in-this-is-it-shot-on-film-or-digital</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:33:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/263025.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is there any CGI in this? Is it shot on film or digital? on Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>VBeretta</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 11, 2017 10:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">IMHO, there is a sequence of Jake Gyllenhaal under a grim, overcast screen, that was created in post- and green screen. The light and other visual elements in that sequence do seem strangely "off" - and since that sky was, IMHO, visually important, it was easier to use VFX than to wait for the right weather.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2232254</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2232254</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is there any CGI in this? Is it shot on film or digital? on Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MrFilmJunkie</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 11, 2017 09:21 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">there's no obvious cgi in this movie though, it's not transphormers or something</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2232253</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2232253</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is there any CGI in this? Is it shot on film or digital? on Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TurboSquirt</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 10, 2017 09:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, gosh darn it. Are there any recent movies that DON'T have any CGI?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2232252</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2232252</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is there any CGI in this? Is it shot on film or digital? on Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MrFilmJunkie</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 10, 2017 05:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/14550098/technical" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/14550098/technical</a><br />
also, there are vfx artists in the credits, so</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2232251</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2232251</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:39:39 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>