<![CDATA[Was the Necessary????]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bad Moms

sallystrutter — 7 years ago(April 29, 2018 01:41 AM)

I thought it was very funny and true and even heart-warming at the end. However, early in the movie, bam, a fully naked beautiful woman appears. You see her breasts and pubic hair for about 3 minutes. Why is that necessary? I always hear that people support nudity for artistic value. I have been saying over the past few years, the "art" has been replaced with "trash. This is a perfect example.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/263274/was-the-necessaryRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 13:08:51 GMTThu, 07 May 2026 23:41:42 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Was the Necessary???? on Thu, 07 May 2026 23:41:43 GMT]]>preachcaleb — 3 years ago(January 30, 2023 02:49 PM)

Yes, it was intended to be humorous. Since this movie is an R-rated comedy, I would say it was necessary.
So many stories, so little time.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2234879https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2234879Thu, 07 May 2026 23:41:43 GMT