<![CDATA[I thought it was very funny and true and even heart-warming at the end. However, early in the movie, bam, a fully naked]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bad Moms

sallystrutter — 7 years ago(April 29, 2018 01:41 AM)

I thought it was very funny and true and even heart-warming at the end. However, early in the movie, bam, a fully naked beautiful woman appears. You see her breasts and pubic hair for about 3 minutes. Why is that necessary? I always hear that people support nudity for artistic value. I have been saying over the past few years, the "art" has been replaced with "trash. This is a perfect example.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/263275/i-thought-it-was-very-funny-and-true-and-even-heart-warming-at-the-end-however-early-in-the-movie-bam-a-fully-nakedRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 19:24:44 GMTThu, 07 May 2026 23:41:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I thought it was very funny and true and even heart-warming at the end. However, early in the movie, bam, a fully naked on Thu, 07 May 2026 23:41:46 GMT]]>preachcaleb — 3 years ago(January 30, 2023 02:49 PM)

Yes, it was intended to be humorous. Since this movie is an R-rated comedy, I would say it was necessary.
So many stories, so little time.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2234881https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2234881Thu, 07 May 2026 23:41:46 GMT