<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Better than empire strikes back?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The New Pope</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>AnthonySocksssss</strong> — <em>1 year ago(February 24, 2025 01:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I always preferred the original</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/264452/better-than-empire-strikes-back</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:57:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/264452.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 03:33:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than empire strikes back? on Fri, 08 May 2026 03:33:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>avensis</strong> — <em>1 year ago(February 24, 2025 05:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hin i also preferred the original.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2244699</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2244699</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 03:33:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>