<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why film in an old format of film?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Brutalist</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>THX1701</strong> — <em>1 year ago(February 04, 2025 07:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why film in an old format of film?<br />
The idea stated in IMDb was to create an old look.  I do not notice this old style look with the film that they used.<br />
With so many filters available with digital processing, I think they wasted money.<br />
How do you all feel about seeing a picture presented in 1.66:1?<br />
—————-<br />
\THX1701/</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/264964/why-film-in-an-old-format-of-film</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:48:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/264964.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 05:20:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>